tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Infection prevention in practice
. 2021 Sep;3(3):100157.
doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100157. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
Association between SARS-CoV-2 exposure and antibody status among healthcare workers in two London hospitals: a cross-sectional study
Admire S Murongazvombo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rachael S Jones[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michael Rayment[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nabeela Mughal[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Berge Azadian[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hugo Donaldson[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Gary W Davies[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Luke Sp Moore[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Alexander M Aiken[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Patient-facing (frontline) health-care workers (HCWs) are at high risk of repeated exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Aim: We sought to determine the association between levels of frontline exposure and likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity amongst HCW.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using purposefully collected data from HCWs at two hospitals in London, United Kingdom (UK) over eight weeks in May-June 2020. Information on sociodemographic, clinical and occupational characteristics was collected using an anonymised questionnaire. Serology was performed using split SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG lateral flow immunoassays. Exposure risk was categorised into five pre-defined ordered grades. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between being frontline and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity after controlling for other risks of infection.
Findings: 615 HCWs participated in the study. 250/615 (40.7%) were SARS-CoV-2 IgM and/or IgG positive. After controlling for other exposures, there was non-significant evidence of a modest association between being a frontline HCW (any level) and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity compared to non-frontline status (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.84-2.30, P=0.200). There was 15% increase in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity for each step along the frontline exposure gradient (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32, P=0.043).
Conclusion: We found a high SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG seropositivity with modest evidence for a dose-response association between increasing levels of frontline exposure risk and seropositivity. Even in well-resourced hospital settings, appropriate use of personal protective equipment, in addition to other transmission-based precautions for inpatient care of SARS-CoV-2 patients could reduce the risk of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline HCW.
Keywords: Coronavirus; Covid-19; Health-care workers; Risk; Sars-cov-2; Serology.
. 2021 Sep;3(3):100157.
doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100157. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
Association between SARS-CoV-2 exposure and antibody status among healthcare workers in two London hospitals: a cross-sectional study
Admire S Murongazvombo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rachael S Jones[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michael Rayment[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nabeela Mughal[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Berge Azadian[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hugo Donaldson[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Gary W Davies[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Luke Sp Moore[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Alexander M Aiken[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34316587
- PMCID: PMC8217738
- DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100157
Abstract
Background: Patient-facing (frontline) health-care workers (HCWs) are at high risk of repeated exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Aim: We sought to determine the association between levels of frontline exposure and likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity amongst HCW.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using purposefully collected data from HCWs at two hospitals in London, United Kingdom (UK) over eight weeks in May-June 2020. Information on sociodemographic, clinical and occupational characteristics was collected using an anonymised questionnaire. Serology was performed using split SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG lateral flow immunoassays. Exposure risk was categorised into five pre-defined ordered grades. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between being frontline and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity after controlling for other risks of infection.
Findings: 615 HCWs participated in the study. 250/615 (40.7%) were SARS-CoV-2 IgM and/or IgG positive. After controlling for other exposures, there was non-significant evidence of a modest association between being a frontline HCW (any level) and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity compared to non-frontline status (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.84-2.30, P=0.200). There was 15% increase in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity for each step along the frontline exposure gradient (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32, P=0.043).
Conclusion: We found a high SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG seropositivity with modest evidence for a dose-response association between increasing levels of frontline exposure risk and seropositivity. Even in well-resourced hospital settings, appropriate use of personal protective equipment, in addition to other transmission-based precautions for inpatient care of SARS-CoV-2 patients could reduce the risk of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline HCW.
Keywords: Coronavirus; Covid-19; Health-care workers; Risk; Sars-cov-2; Serology.