tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Drug Resist
. 2022 Dec 23;15:7619-7630.
doi: 10.2147/IDR.S395095. eCollection 2022.
Comparison Between Physiological Scores SIPF, CURB-65, and APACHE II as Predictors of Prognosis and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Multicenter Study, Saudi Arabia
Safwat Eldaboosy[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Zainab Almoosa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mustafa Saad[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mohammad Al Abdullah[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Abdallah Farouk[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Amgad Awad[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Waheed Mahdy[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP], Eman Abdelsalam[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Sameh O Nour[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sameh Makled[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ahmed Shaarawy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hatem Kanany[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Samer Qarah[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ahmed Kabil[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: A coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) is associated with catastrophic effects on the world with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of physiological shock index (SIPF) (shock index and hypoxemia), CURB -65, acute physiology, and chronic health assessment II (APACHE II) as predictors of prognosis and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
Methods: In Saudi Arabia, a multicenter retrospective study was conducted on hospitalized adult patients confirmed to have COVID-19 pneumonia. Information needed to calculate SIPF, CURB-65, and APACHE II scores were obtained from medical records within 24 hours of admission.
Results: The study included 1131 COVID-19 patients who met the inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups: (A) the ICU group (n=340; 30.1%) and (B) the ward group (n=791; 69.9%). The most common concomitant diseases of patients at initial ICU admission were hypertension (71.5%) and diabetes (62.4%), and most of them were men (63.8%). The overall mortality was 18.7%, and the mortality rate was higher in the ICU group than in the ward group (39.4% vs 9.6%; p < 0.001). The SIPF score showed a significantly higher ability to predict both ICU admission and mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia compared with APACHE II and CURB -65; (AUC 0.89 vs 0.87; p < 0.001) and (AUC 0.89 vs 0.84; p < 0.001) for ICU admission and (AUC 0.90 vs 0.65; p < 0.001) and (AUC 0.90 vs 0.80; p < 0.001) for mortality, respectively.
Conclusion: The ability of the SIPF score to predict ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia is higher than that of APACHE II and CURB-65. The overall mortality was 18.7%, and the mortality rate was higher in the ICU group than in the ward group (39.4% vs 9.6%; p < 0.001).
Keywords: APACHE II; COVID-19; CURB-65; SIPF; coronavirus; mortality; pneumonia.
. 2022 Dec 23;15:7619-7630.
doi: 10.2147/IDR.S395095. eCollection 2022.
Comparison Between Physiological Scores SIPF, CURB-65, and APACHE II as Predictors of Prognosis and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Multicenter Study, Saudi Arabia
Safwat Eldaboosy[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Zainab Almoosa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mustafa Saad[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mohammad Al Abdullah[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Abdallah Farouk[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Amgad Awad[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Waheed Mahdy[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP], Eman Abdelsalam[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Sameh O Nour[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sameh Makled[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ahmed Shaarawy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hatem Kanany[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Samer Qarah[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ahmed Kabil[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36582451
- PMCID: PMC9793736
- DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S395095
Abstract
Background: A coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) is associated with catastrophic effects on the world with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of physiological shock index (SIPF) (shock index and hypoxemia), CURB -65, acute physiology, and chronic health assessment II (APACHE II) as predictors of prognosis and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
Methods: In Saudi Arabia, a multicenter retrospective study was conducted on hospitalized adult patients confirmed to have COVID-19 pneumonia. Information needed to calculate SIPF, CURB-65, and APACHE II scores were obtained from medical records within 24 hours of admission.
Results: The study included 1131 COVID-19 patients who met the inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups: (A) the ICU group (n=340; 30.1%) and (B) the ward group (n=791; 69.9%). The most common concomitant diseases of patients at initial ICU admission were hypertension (71.5%) and diabetes (62.4%), and most of them were men (63.8%). The overall mortality was 18.7%, and the mortality rate was higher in the ICU group than in the ward group (39.4% vs 9.6%; p < 0.001). The SIPF score showed a significantly higher ability to predict both ICU admission and mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia compared with APACHE II and CURB -65; (AUC 0.89 vs 0.87; p < 0.001) and (AUC 0.89 vs 0.84; p < 0.001) for ICU admission and (AUC 0.90 vs 0.65; p < 0.001) and (AUC 0.90 vs 0.80; p < 0.001) for mortality, respectively.
Conclusion: The ability of the SIPF score to predict ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia is higher than that of APACHE II and CURB-65. The overall mortality was 18.7%, and the mortality rate was higher in the ICU group than in the ward group (39.4% vs 9.6%; p < 0.001).
Keywords: APACHE II; COVID-19; CURB-65; SIPF; coronavirus; mortality; pneumonia.