• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Infect Dis Ther . Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Dis Ther


. 2022 Oct 1.
doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00691-z. Online ahead of print.
Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Ambulatory Patients with COVID-19


Jessica J Jalbert[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mohamed Hussein[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vera Mastey[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Robert J Sanchez[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Degang Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dana Murdock[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Laura Fariñas[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jonathan Bussey[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carlos Duart[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Boaz Hirshberg[SUP] 2 [/SUP], David M Weinreich[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Wenhui Wei[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: Data on real-world effectiveness of subcutaneous (SC) casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of SC CAS+IMD versus no antibody treatment among patients with COVID-19.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study linked Komodo Health and CDR Maguire Health and Medical data. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in ambulatory settings (August 1-October 30, 2021) treated with SC CAS+IMD were exact- and propensity score-matched to fewer than five untreated treatment-eligible patients and followed for the composite endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality or COVID-19-related hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to calculate outcome risk overall and across subgroups. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Of 13,522 patients treated with CAS+IMD, 12,972 were matched to 41,848 untreated patients. The 30-day composite outcome risk was 1.9% (95% CI 1.7-2.2) and 4.4% (95% CI 4.2-4.6) in the treated and untreated cohorts, respectively; treated patients had a 49% lower relative risk of the composite outcome (aHR 0.51; 95% CI 0.46-0.58) and a 67% relative risk of 30-day mortality (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.60). Effectiveness was consistent across vaccination status and various subgroups.
Discussion: Patients with COVID-19 benefitted from treatment with SC CAS+IMD versus untreated patients. The results were consistent across subgroups of patients, including older adults, immunocompromised patients, and patients vaccinated against COVID-19. Results were robust across numerous sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion: SC CAS+IMD is effective in reducing 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization or mortality in real-world outpatient settings during the Delta-dominant period.

Keywords: COVID-19; Casirivimab; Imdevimab; Monoclonal antibodies; Treatment.
 
Back
Top Bottom