• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Infect Dis Model. An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov)

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Dis Model. 2020 Feb 11;5:248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.001. eCollection 2020. [h=1]An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov).[/h]
Tang B[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Bragazzi NL[SUP]2[/SUP], Li Q[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Tang S[SUP]4[/SUP], Xiao Y[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Wu J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The basic reproduction number of an infectious agent is the average number of infections one case can generate over the course of the infectious period, in a na?ve, uninfected population. It is well-known that the estimation of this number may vary due to several methodological issues, including different assumptions and choice of parameters, utilized models, used datasets and estimation period. With the spreading of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection, the reproduction number has been found to vary, reflecting the dynamics of transmission of the coronavirus outbreak as well as the case reporting rate. Due to significant variations in the control strategies, which have been changing over time, and thanks to the introduction of detection technologies that have been rapidly improved, enabling to shorten the time from infection/symptoms onset to diagnosis, leading to faster confirmation of the new coronavirus cases, our previous estimations on the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV need to be revised. By using time-dependent contact and diagnose rates, we refit our previously proposed dynamics transmission model to the data available until January 29th[SUP],[/SUP] 2020 and re-estimated the effective daily reproduction ratio that better quantifies the evolution of the interventions. We estimated when the effective daily reproduction ratio has fallen below 1 and when the epidemics will peak. Our updated findings suggest that the best measure is persistent and strict self-isolation. The epidemics will continue to grow, and can peak soon with the peak time depending highly on the public health interventions practically implemented.
? 2020 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Basic reproduction number; Effective daily reproduction ratio; Emerging and reemerging pathogens; Mathematical modeling; Novel coronavirus

PMID: 32099934 PMCID: PMC7029158 DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.001
 
Back
Top