• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Infect Dis Model . Age-structured model for COVID-19: Effectiveness of social distancing and contact reduction in Kenya

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Dis Model


. 2020 Nov 10.
doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.10.012. Online ahead of print.
Age-structured model for COVID-19: Effectiveness of social distancing and contact reduction in Kenya


Mark Kimathi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samuel Mwalili[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Viona Ojiambo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Duncan Kioi Gathungu[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Kenya reported its first case on March 13, 2020 and by March 16, 2020 she instituted physical distancing strategies to reduce transmission and flatten the epidemic curve. An age-structured compartmental model was developed to assess the impact of the strategies on COVID-19 severity and burden. Contacts between different ages are incorporated via contact matrices. Simulation results show that 45% reduction in contacts for 60-days period resulted to 11.5-13% reduction of infections severity and deaths, while for the 190-days period yielded 18.8-22.7% reduction. The peak of infections in the 60-days mitigation was higher and happened about 2 months after the relaxation of mitigation as compared to that of the 190-days mitigation, which happened a month after mitigations were relaxed. Low numbers of cases in children under 15 years was attributed to high number of asymptomatic cases. High numbers of cases are reported in the 15-29 years and 30-59 years age bands. Two mitigation periods, considered in the study, resulted to reductions in severe and critical cases, attack rates, hospital and ICU bed demands, as well as deaths, with the 190-days period giving higher reductions.

Keywords: Age structured; Contact matrix; Coronavirus; Mathematical model; Non-pharmaceutical intervention.
 
Back
Top Bottom