tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
. 2021 Jan 25;1-102.
doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.18. Online ahead of print.
Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chenchen Tian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Olivia Lovrics[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alon Vaisman[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ki Jinn Chin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], George Tomlinson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yung Lee[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Marina Englesakis[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Matteo Parotto[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP], Mandeep Singh[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objective: To investigate risk factors for HCW infection in viral respiratory pandemics (SARS-CoV-2, MERS, SARS CoV-1, influenza A H1N1, influenza H5N1) and improve understanding of HCW risk management amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from conception until July 2020 for studies comparing infected HCWs (cases) and non-infected HCWs (controls) and risk factors for infection. Outcomes included HCW types, infection prevention practices, and medical procedures. Pooled effect estimates with pathogen-specific stratified meta-analysis and inverse variance meta-regression analysis were completed. GRADE framework was used to rate certainty of evidence. PROSPERO (CRD42020176232) 6 April 2020.
Results: Fifty-four comparative studies were included (n=191,004 HCWs). Compared to non-frontline HCWs, frontline HCWs were at increased infection risk (OR 1.66 95%CI 1.24 to 2.22) and greater for HCWs involved in endotracheal intubations (risk difference [95%CI]: 35.2% [21.4 to 47.9]). Use of gloves, gown, surgical mask, N95 respirator, face protection, and infection training were each strongly protective against infection. Meta-regression showed reduced infection risk in frontline HCWs working in facilities with infection designated wards (OR -1.04, 95%CI -1.53 to -0.33, p=0.004) and performing aerosol-generating medical procedures in designated centres (OR -1.30 95%CI -2.52 to -0.08; p=0.037).
Conclusions: During highly infectious respiratory pandemics, widely available protective measures such as use of gloves, gowns, and face masks are strongly protective against infection and should be instituted, preferably in dedicated settings, to protect frontline HCW during waves of respiratory virus pandemics.
. 2021 Jan 25;1-102.
doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.18. Online ahead of print.
Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chenchen Tian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Olivia Lovrics[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alon Vaisman[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ki Jinn Chin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], George Tomlinson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yung Lee[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Marina Englesakis[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Matteo Parotto[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP], Mandeep Singh[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33487203
- DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.18
Abstract
Objective: To investigate risk factors for HCW infection in viral respiratory pandemics (SARS-CoV-2, MERS, SARS CoV-1, influenza A H1N1, influenza H5N1) and improve understanding of HCW risk management amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from conception until July 2020 for studies comparing infected HCWs (cases) and non-infected HCWs (controls) and risk factors for infection. Outcomes included HCW types, infection prevention practices, and medical procedures. Pooled effect estimates with pathogen-specific stratified meta-analysis and inverse variance meta-regression analysis were completed. GRADE framework was used to rate certainty of evidence. PROSPERO (CRD42020176232) 6 April 2020.
Results: Fifty-four comparative studies were included (n=191,004 HCWs). Compared to non-frontline HCWs, frontline HCWs were at increased infection risk (OR 1.66 95%CI 1.24 to 2.22) and greater for HCWs involved in endotracheal intubations (risk difference [95%CI]: 35.2% [21.4 to 47.9]). Use of gloves, gown, surgical mask, N95 respirator, face protection, and infection training were each strongly protective against infection. Meta-regression showed reduced infection risk in frontline HCWs working in facilities with infection designated wards (OR -1.04, 95%CI -1.53 to -0.33, p=0.004) and performing aerosol-generating medical procedures in designated centres (OR -1.30 95%CI -2.52 to -0.08; p=0.037).
Conclusions: During highly infectious respiratory pandemics, widely available protective measures such as use of gloves, gowns, and face masks are strongly protective against infection and should be instituted, preferably in dedicated settings, to protect frontline HCW during waves of respiratory virus pandemics.