• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Infect Chemother . Usefulness of The Rapid Antigen Test in Detecting SARS-CoV-2 for Infection Control in Hospitals

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Chemother


. 2023 Nov 13.
doi: 10.3947/ic.2023.0077. Online ahead of print. Usefulness of The Rapid Antigen Test in Detecting SARS-CoV-2 for Infection Control in Hospitals

Jeong Young Lee[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiwon Jung[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jae Lim Jo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Young-Ju Lim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sun-Kyung Kim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hyejin Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Soyeon Park[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eun Ok Kim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sung-Han Kim[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: We aimed at evaluating the diagnostic performance of rapid antigen test (RAT) compared to PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and the possible transmission of infection to close contacts from patients with negative RAT and positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results.
Materials and methods: Patients/guardians urgently requiring admission to the ward on the same day had been hospitalized with RAT-negative result before the PCR results were available. We performed an epidemiologic investigation of the close contacts of those with negative RAT but positive PCR results after hospitalization.
Results: A total of 4,237 RATs were performed from March to August 2022. When the PCR test was used as the reference, RAT had a sensitivity of 28.8% (17/59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.8 - 42.1), a specificity of 100% (4,220/4,220; 95% CI: 99.9 - 100.0), a positive predictive value of 100.0% (17/17; 95% CI: 100.0 - 100.0), and a negative predictive value of 99.0% (4,178/4,220; 95% CI: 99.3 - 99.8). The epidemiologic investigation revealed that among the 32 patients with negative RAT and subsequent positive PCR results after admission into multi-patient room, two (6.3%) showed secondary coronavirus disease 2019.
Conclusion: The secondary transmission rate from patients with negative RAT and positive PCR results was low. Our data suggest that RAT may be useful for rapid exclusion of high transmissible cases. However, further evaluation using whole genome sequencing is needed to determine the potential for transmissibility in cases showing a negative RAT but a positive PCR result.

Keywords: COVID-19; Contact tracing; Infection control; Rapid diagnostic test.

 
Back
Top Bottom