• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Indoor Wood-Burning Stove and Fireplace Use and Breast Cancer in a Prospective Cohort Study

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/ehp827/
Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/EHP827

[h=1]Indoor Wood-Burning Stove and Fireplace Use and Breast Cancer in a Prospective Cohort Study[/h] Alexandra J. White and Dale P. Sandler
  • Background: Indoor burning of fuel for heating or cooking releases carcinogens. Little is known about the impact of indoor air pollution from wood-burning stoves or fireplaces on breast cancer risk. Objectives: In a large prospective cohort study, we evaluated the risk of breast cancer in relation to indoor heating and cooking practices. Methods: Sister Study participants (n=50,884) were recruited from 2003?2009. Breast cancer?free women in the United States or Puerto Rico, 35?74 y old, with a sister with breast cancer were eligible. Participants completed questionnaires on indoor heating and cooking practices for both their enrollment and their longest adult residence. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between indoor heating/cooking and breast cancer. Results: A total of 2,416 breast cancer cases were diagnosed during follow-up (mean=6.4 y). Having an indoor wood-burning stove/fireplace in the longest adult residence was associated with a higher breast cancer risk [HR=1.11 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.22)]; the risk increased with average frequency of use [≥once/week, HR=1.17 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.34)] (p for trend=0.01). An elevated HR was seen for women burning wood [HR=1.09 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.21)] or natural gas/propane [HR=1.15 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.32)]. No association was observed for burning artificial fire-logs [HR=0.98 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.12)] except among women from western states [HR=1.36 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.81)]. Conclusions: In this prospective study, using an indoor wood-burning stove/fireplace in the longest adult residence at least once a week and burning either wood or natural gas/propane was associated with a modestly higher risk of breast cancer. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP827

There were 2,416 breast cancers diagnosed during the follow-up period (mean=6.4 y), 1,843 of which were determined to be invasive. Having a wood-burning stove/fireplace in the longest adult residence was associated with slightly increased breast cancer risk [Number of exposed cases (n)=1,500; HR=1.11 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.22)] (Table 2). There was a trend of higher breast cancer risk with increased frequency of use (p=0.01); those who used an indoor wood-burning stove/fireplace at least once a week had the highest HR [n=327; HR=1.17 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.34)] relative to those who did not have a wood-burning stove/fireplace in their longest adult residence. Although the HR for invasive cases did not differ significantly from in situ cases in a direct comparison, the estimate for weekly wood-burning stove/fireplace use was apparent for invasive breast cancer [n=265; HR=1.25 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.46)] but not for DCIS [n=59; HR=0.96 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.31)] (invasive vs. DCIS, p=0.7).

A report from the U.S. EPA suggested that fireplaces in the west were notably larger and thus would produce more emissions (Houck et al. 1998), which may explain, possibly in conjunction with differences in age of home and ventilation, the increase in risk observed for women in the west, if this effect is real.
 
Back
Top