• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Indonesian backyard poultry survey finds H5N1 differences in ducks

Gert van der Hoek

In Memoriam - Editor, Senior Moderator
A molecular and antigenic survey of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus isolates from smallholder duck farms in Central Java, Indonesia during 2007-2008

Indonesia is one of the countries most severely affected by H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus in terms of poultry and human health. However, there is little information on the diversity of H5N1 viruses circulating in backyard farms, where chickens and ducks often intermingle.

In this study, H5N1 virus infection occurring in 96 smallholder duck farms in Central Java, Indonesia from 2007-2008 was investigated and the molecular and antigenic characteristics of H5N1 viruses isolated from these farms were analysed.

Results: All 84 characterised viruses belonged to H5N1 clade 2.1 with three virus sublineages being identified: clade 2.1.1 (1), clade 2.1.3 (80), and IDN/6/05-like viruses (3) that did not belong to any of the present clades. All three clades were found in ducks, while only clade 2.1.3 was isolated from chickens.

There were no significant amino acid mutations of the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) sites of the viruses, including the receptor binding, glycosylation, antigenic and catalytic sites and NA inhibitor targets. All the viruses had polybasic amino acids at the HA cleavage site.

No evidence of major antigenic variants was detected. Based on the HA gene, identical virus variants could be found on different farms across the study sites and multiple genetic variants could be isolated from HPAI outbreaks simultaneously or at different time points from single farms.

HPAI virus was isolated from both ducks and chickens; however, the proportion of surviving duck cases was considerably higher than in chickens.

Conclusions: The 2.1.3 clade was the most common lineage found in this study. All the viruses had sequence characteristic of HPAI, but negligible variations in other recognized amino acids at the HA and NA proteins which determine virus phenotypes.

Multiple genetic variants appeared to be circulating simultaneously within poultry communities. The high proportion of live duck cases compared to chickens over the study period suggests that ducks are more likely to survive infection and they may better suit the role of long-term maintenance host for H5N1.

As some viruses were isolated from dead birds, there was no clear correlation between genetic variations and pathogenicity of these viruses.

Source: Virology Journal 2011, 8:425

Via 7thspace
 
Re: Survey of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus isolates from smallholder duck farms in Central Java, Indonesia during 2007-2008

Re: Survey of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus isolates from smallholder duck farms in Central Java, Indonesia during 2007-2008

Nice summary from CIDRAP:

Indonesian backyard poultry survey finds H5N1 differences in ducks

A study today profiling H5N1 avian flu viruses in Indonesia's backyard farms found that ducks were more likely than chickens to survive their infections. Also, the Australian and Indonesian researchers found no evidence of major antigenic variants.

They conducted the longitudinal survey between March 2007 and March 2008 at 96 small duck farms in four Java province districts. Every 2 months they collected oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs from individually banded ducks and from chickens they were in contact with on the farms. Viral samples were also collected from dead and live birds during the investigation of outbreaks at the study farms.

Researchers ran molecular and virologic tests to explore relationships between the circulating viruses. Of 132 samples collected, the group found viable H5 viruses in 84. All belonged to clade 2.1 and fell into three virus sublineages.

They found no major amino acid mutations of the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase sites. Multiple variants were found on different farms and at different times on single farms. The proportion of virus isolated from surviving ducks was higher than that of chickens, suggesting that ducks may be more resistant to infection and may play a role in maintaining Indonesia's H5N1 lineages.
 
Back
Top