• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Individual decision-making and childhood vaccination, 24 May 2013, Stockholm, Sweden (ECDC, October 31 2013, extract)

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), full PDF document: (LINK). Extract.]


Individual decision-making and childhood vaccination, 24 May 2013, Stockholm, Sweden


Introduction

The European Union (EU) aspires to be measles-free, which will require high vaccination coverage across the entire region [1].

Yet in recent years there have been fairly large measles outbreaks in Europe; one very plausible interpretation from the 2011 outbreak in France, for example, is that this is due to ?persistent suboptimal vaccine coverage?[2].

Among the many important reasons for suboptimal vaccination coverage, a significant one that certain population segments actively decide not to vaccinate.

ECDC has previously investigated key barriers to vaccination among hard-to-reach populations [3], and yet it is commonly observed that in addition to such populations, some segments of the general European population may also be sceptical towards vaccination.

In order to explore this topic in greater depth, ECDC organised a meeting which took place in Stockholm on 24 May 2013.

The aim was to exchange cross-disciplinary perspectives, from epidemiology, anthropology, sociology and behavioural psychology, in order to explore the issue of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine refusals among the European ?middle classes?.

In particular, objectives for this meeting workshop included:

  • to explore the key drivers behind recent trends in measles epidemiology and vaccination coverage in Europe
  • to identify and conceptualise the myriad social and political factors that affect individual decision-making as concerns vaccination
  • to identify and examine best practices in public health for monitoring and addressing public mistrust in vaccines
  • to identify potential ECDC activities in this field.
This report briefly highlights the principal themes discussed in the meeting and identifies avenues for further exploration.

The meeting was conducted under Chatham House Rules, meaning that participants could express any opinion they wished with the knowledge that the meeting report would not attribute statements to particular individuals.

(?)

________

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

Stockholm, October 2013


-
------
 
Back
Top Bottom