• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
ARTICLES

Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors

<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>
</td></tr></tbody></table>
<nobr>Lars Holmberg</nobr>, <nobr>Ole-Erik Iversen</nobr>, <nobr>Carl Magnus Rudenstam</nobr>, <nobr>Mats Hammar</nobr>, <nobr>Eero Kumpulainen</nobr>, <nobr>Janusz Jaskiewicz</nobr>, <nobr>Jacek Jassem</nobr>, <nobr>Daria Dobaczewska</nobr>, <nobr>Hans E. Fjosne</nobr>, <nobr>Octavio Peralta</nobr>, <nobr>Rodrigo Arriagada</nobr>, <nobr>Marit Holmqvist</nobr>, <nobr>Johanna Maenpa</nobr>
On behalf of the HABITS Study Group [SIZE=-1]

Affiliations of authors:
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (LH, M. Holmqvist); Regional Oncologic Center, Uppsala, Sweden (LH, M. Holmqvist); King’s College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, London, UK (LH); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Bergen University, Bergen, Norway (OEI); International Breast Cancer Study Group Coordination Center, Bern, Switzerland (CMR); Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden (M. Hammar); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland (EK); Departments of Oncology and Radiotherapy (J. Jassem) and Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery (J. Jaskiewicz, DD), Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland; Department of Surgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway (HEF); Chilean Oncology Research Cooperative Group, Santiago, Chile (OP, RA); Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (RA); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (JM) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Correspondence to: Lars Holmberg, MD, PhD, King's College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, 3rd Floor, Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK (e-mail: lars.holmberg@kcl.ac.uk<script type="text/javascript"><!-- var u = "lars.holmberg", d = "kcl.ac.uk"; document.getElementById("em0").innerHTML = '<a href="mailto:' + u + '@' + d + '">' + u + '@' + d + '<\/a>'//--></script>).[/SIZE]
<!-- ABS -->
Background: Hormone replacement therapy (HT) is known to increase the risk<sup> </sup>of breast cancer in healthy women, but its effect on breast<sup> </sup>cancer risk in breast cancer survivors is less clear. The randomized<sup> </sup>HABITS study, which compared HT for menopausal symptoms with<sup> </sup>best management without hormones among women with previously<sup> </sup>treated breast cancer, was stopped early due to suspicions of<sup> </sup>an increased risk of new breast cancer events following HT.<sup> </sup>We present results after extended follow-up.<sup>

</sup> Methods: HABITS was a randomized, non–placebo-controlled noninferiority<sup> </sup>trial that aimed to be at a power of 80% to detect a 36% increase<sup> </sup>in the hazard ratio (HR) for a new breast cancer event following<sup> </sup>HT. Cox models were used to estimate relative risks of a breast<sup> </sup>cancer event, the maximum likelihood method was used to calculate<sup> </sup>95% confidence intervals (CIs), and
chi.gif
<sup>2</sup> tests were used to assess<sup> </sup>statistical significance, with all P values based on two-sided<sup> </sup>tests. The absolute risk of a new breast cancer event was estimated<sup> </sup>with the cumulative incidence function. Most patients who received<sup> </sup>HT were prescribed continuous combined or sequential estradiol<sup> </sup>hemihydrate and norethisterone.<sup> </sup>

Results: Of the 447 women randomly assigned, 442 could be followed for<sup> </sup>a median of 4 years. Thirty-nine of the 221 women in the HT<sup> </sup>arm and 17 of the 221 women in the control arm experienced a<sup> </sup>new breast cancer event (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 4.2). Cumulative<sup> </sup>incidences at 5 years were 22.2% in the HT arm and 8.0% in the<sup> </sup>control arm. By the end of follow-up, six women in the HT arm<sup> </sup>had died of breast cancer and six were alive with distant metastases.<sup> </sup>In the control arm, five women had died of breast cancer and<sup> </sup>four had metastatic breast cancer (P = .51, log-rank test).<sup> </sup>

Conclusion: After extended follow-up, there was a clinically and statistically<sup> </sup>significant increased risk of a new breast cancer event in survivors<sup> </sup>who took HT.


http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/...INDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT
 
Back
Top