sharon sanders
Editor-in-Chief & President
ARTICLES
Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>
</td></tr></tbody></table>
<nobr>Lars Holmberg</nobr>, <nobr>Ole-Erik Iversen</nobr>, <nobr>Carl Magnus Rudenstam</nobr>, <nobr>Mats Hammar</nobr>, <nobr>Eero Kumpulainen</nobr>, <nobr>Janusz Jaskiewicz</nobr>, <nobr>Jacek Jassem</nobr>, <nobr>Daria Dobaczewska</nobr>, <nobr>Hans E. Fjosne</nobr>, <nobr>Octavio Peralta</nobr>, <nobr>Rodrigo Arriagada</nobr>, <nobr>Marit Holmqvist</nobr>, <nobr>Johanna Maenpa</nobr>
On behalf of the HABITS Study Group [SIZE=-1]
Affiliations of authors: Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (LH, M. Holmqvist); Regional Oncologic Center, Uppsala, Sweden (LH, M. Holmqvist); King’s College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, London, UK (LH); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Bergen University, Bergen, Norway (OEI); International Breast Cancer Study Group Coordination Center, Bern, Switzerland (CMR); Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden (M. Hammar); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland (EK); Departments of Oncology and Radiotherapy (J. Jassem) and Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery (J. Jaskiewicz, DD), Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland; Department of Surgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway (HEF); Chilean Oncology Research Cooperative Group, Santiago, Chile (OP, RA); Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (RA); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (JM) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Correspondence to: Lars Holmberg, MD, PhD, King's College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, 3rd Floor, Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK (e-mail: lars.holmberg@kcl.ac.uk<script type="text/javascript"><!-- var u = "lars.holmberg", d = "kcl.ac.uk"; document.getElementById("em0").innerHTML = '<a href="mailto:' + u + '@' + d + '">' + u + '@' + d + '<\/a>'//--></script>).[/SIZE]
<!-- ABS -->
Background: Hormone replacement therapy (HT) is known to increase the risk<sup> </sup>of breast cancer in healthy women, but its effect on breast<sup> </sup>cancer risk in breast cancer survivors is less clear. The randomized<sup> </sup>HABITS study, which compared HT for menopausal symptoms with<sup> </sup>best management without hormones among women with previously<sup> </sup>treated breast cancer, was stopped early due to suspicions of<sup> </sup>an increased risk of new breast cancer events following HT.<sup> </sup>We present results after extended follow-up.<sup>
</sup> Methods: HABITS was a randomized, non–placebo-controlled noninferiority<sup> </sup>trial that aimed to be at a power of 80% to detect a 36% increase<sup> </sup>in the hazard ratio (HR) for a new breast cancer event following<sup> </sup>HT. Cox models were used to estimate relative risks of a breast<sup> </sup>cancer event, the maximum likelihood method was used to calculate<sup> </sup>95% confidence intervals (CIs), and
<sup>2</sup> tests were used to assess<sup> </sup>statistical significance, with all P values based on two-sided<sup> </sup>tests. The absolute risk of a new breast cancer event was estimated<sup> </sup>with the cumulative incidence function. Most patients who received<sup> </sup>HT were prescribed continuous combined or sequential estradiol<sup> </sup>hemihydrate and norethisterone.<sup> </sup>
Results: Of the 447 women randomly assigned, 442 could be followed for<sup> </sup>a median of 4 years. Thirty-nine of the 221 women in the HT<sup> </sup>arm and 17 of the 221 women in the control arm experienced a<sup> </sup>new breast cancer event (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 4.2). Cumulative<sup> </sup>incidences at 5 years were 22.2% in the HT arm and 8.0% in the<sup> </sup>control arm. By the end of follow-up, six women in the HT arm<sup> </sup>had died of breast cancer and six were alive with distant metastases.<sup> </sup>In the control arm, five women had died of breast cancer and<sup> </sup>four had metastatic breast cancer (P = .51, log-rank test).<sup> </sup>
Conclusion: After extended follow-up, there was a clinically and statistically<sup> </sup>significant increased risk of a new breast cancer event in survivors<sup> </sup>who took HT.
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/...INDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT
Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>
</td></tr></tbody></table>
<nobr>Lars Holmberg</nobr>, <nobr>Ole-Erik Iversen</nobr>, <nobr>Carl Magnus Rudenstam</nobr>, <nobr>Mats Hammar</nobr>, <nobr>Eero Kumpulainen</nobr>, <nobr>Janusz Jaskiewicz</nobr>, <nobr>Jacek Jassem</nobr>, <nobr>Daria Dobaczewska</nobr>, <nobr>Hans E. Fjosne</nobr>, <nobr>Octavio Peralta</nobr>, <nobr>Rodrigo Arriagada</nobr>, <nobr>Marit Holmqvist</nobr>, <nobr>Johanna Maenpa</nobr>
On behalf of the HABITS Study Group [SIZE=-1]
Affiliations of authors: Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (LH, M. Holmqvist); Regional Oncologic Center, Uppsala, Sweden (LH, M. Holmqvist); King’s College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, London, UK (LH); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Bergen University, Bergen, Norway (OEI); International Breast Cancer Study Group Coordination Center, Bern, Switzerland (CMR); Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden (M. Hammar); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland (EK); Departments of Oncology and Radiotherapy (J. Jassem) and Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery (J. Jaskiewicz, DD), Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland; Department of Surgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway (HEF); Chilean Oncology Research Cooperative Group, Santiago, Chile (OP, RA); Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (RA); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (JM) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Correspondence to: Lars Holmberg, MD, PhD, King's College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, 3rd Floor, Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK (e-mail: lars.holmberg@kcl.ac.uk<script type="text/javascript"><!-- var u = "lars.holmberg", d = "kcl.ac.uk"; document.getElementById("em0").innerHTML = '<a href="mailto:' + u + '@' + d + '">' + u + '@' + d + '<\/a>'//--></script>).[/SIZE]
<!-- ABS -->
Background: Hormone replacement therapy (HT) is known to increase the risk<sup> </sup>of breast cancer in healthy women, but its effect on breast<sup> </sup>cancer risk in breast cancer survivors is less clear. The randomized<sup> </sup>HABITS study, which compared HT for menopausal symptoms with<sup> </sup>best management without hormones among women with previously<sup> </sup>treated breast cancer, was stopped early due to suspicions of<sup> </sup>an increased risk of new breast cancer events following HT.<sup> </sup>We present results after extended follow-up.<sup>
</sup> Methods: HABITS was a randomized, non–placebo-controlled noninferiority<sup> </sup>trial that aimed to be at a power of 80% to detect a 36% increase<sup> </sup>in the hazard ratio (HR) for a new breast cancer event following<sup> </sup>HT. Cox models were used to estimate relative risks of a breast<sup> </sup>cancer event, the maximum likelihood method was used to calculate<sup> </sup>95% confidence intervals (CIs), and
Results: Of the 447 women randomly assigned, 442 could be followed for<sup> </sup>a median of 4 years. Thirty-nine of the 221 women in the HT<sup> </sup>arm and 17 of the 221 women in the control arm experienced a<sup> </sup>new breast cancer event (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 4.2). Cumulative<sup> </sup>incidences at 5 years were 22.2% in the HT arm and 8.0% in the<sup> </sup>control arm. By the end of follow-up, six women in the HT arm<sup> </sup>had died of breast cancer and six were alive with distant metastases.<sup> </sup>In the control arm, five women had died of breast cancer and<sup> </sup>four had metastatic breast cancer (P = .51, log-rank test).<sup> </sup>
Conclusion: After extended follow-up, there was a clinically and statistically<sup> </sup>significant increased risk of a new breast cancer event in survivors<sup> </sup>who took HT.
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/...INDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT