• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Improving vaccination of pregnant women against seasonal influenza through use of a mandatory field in the obstetric electronic medical record

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Nov 28. pii: fdz099. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz099. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Improving vaccination of pregnant women against seasonal influenza through use of a mandatory field in the obstetric electronic medical record.[/h]
Orefice R[SUP]1[/SUP], Quinlivan JA[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia. 2 School of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia. 3 Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] The aim of the present study was to determine whether using a mandatory data field in an electronic health record would increase compliance with the recommendation to vaccinate pregnant women against influenza.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Two cohorts of women who delivered at the Centenary Hospital for Women and Children between 1-31 July 2015 and 1-31 July 2017 were compared for compliance with the national public health recommendation to vaccinate all pregnant women against influenza. The single change between audit periods was programming the electronic health record to include a mandatory field preventing clinicians from closing patient files unless they selected an answer to the question asking whether influenza vaccination had been performed. Data were audited and compliance rates were compared.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] A total of 275 and 299 women delivered in the two audit periods. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal characteristics between the two cohorts except for maternal age, which was younger in the second period (33.3 versus 31.5 years; P = 0.001). Vaccination rates doubled between audit periods (35.0% versus 79.8%, P < 0.0001).
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Introducing a mandatory data field into an electronic health record system may increase compliance with public health interventions, such as influenza vaccination in pregnant women.
? The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] electronic health record; influenza; mandatory field; obstetrics; pregnancy; vaccination

PMID: 31774534 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz099
 
Back
Top Bottom