• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Impact of the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic on Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Care Center in New York City

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;34(8):825-31. doi: 10.1086/671271. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
Impact of the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic on Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Care Center in New York City.
Bhadelia N, Sonti R, McCarthy JW, Vorenkamp J, Jia H, Saiman L, Yoko Furuya E.
Source

Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract

Background and Objective. Assessing the impact of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) on healthcare workers (HCWs) is important for pandemic planning. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed employee health records of HCWs at a tertiary care center in New York City with influenza-like illnesses (ILI) and confirmed influenza from March 31, 2009, to February 28, 2010. We evaluated HCWs' clinical presentations during the first and second wave of the pandemic, staff absenteeism, exposures among HCWs, and association between high-risk occupational exposures to respiratory secretions and infection. Results. During the pandemic, 40% (141/352) of HCWs with ILI tested positive for influenza, representing a 1% attack rate among our 13,066 employees. HCWs with influenza were more likely to have fever, cough, and tachycardia. When compared with the second wave, cases in the first wave were sicker and at higher risk of exposure to patients' respiratory secretions ([Formula: see text]). HCWs with ILI-with and without confirmed influenza-missed on average 4.7 and 2.7 work days, respectively ([Formula: see text]). Among HCWs asked about working while ill, 65% (153/235) reported they did so (mean, 2 days). Conclusions. HCWs in the first wave had more severe ILI than those in the second wave and were more likely to be exposed to patients' respiratory secretions. HCWs with ILI often worked while ill. Timely strategies to educate and support HCWs were critical to managing this population during the pandemic.

PMID:
23838223
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23838223
 
Back
Top Bottom