• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 Sep 13;4(6):e398. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000398. eCollection 2017 Nov.
[h=1]Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study.[/h] Ufer M[SUP]1[/SUP], Shakeri-Nejad K[SUP]1[/SUP], Gardin A[SUP]1[/SUP], Su Z[SUP]1[/SUP], Paule I[SUP]1[/SUP], Marbury TC[SUP]1[/SUP], Legangneux E[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To evaluate effects of siponimod on response to T-cell-dependent (influenza) and T-cell-independent (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPV-23]) vaccinations in healthy participants.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, each participant underwent a 7-week treatment period and received intramuscular injections of influenza and PPV-23 vaccines (day 21). Participants were randomized to 4 treatment groups (N = 30 each) and received placebo or siponimod 2 mg once daily in concomitant, interrupted, or preceding fashion. Individual response to vaccination was defined by a ≥4-fold (influenza) antibody titer increase and by a ≥2-fold increase in serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G concentrations (PPV-23) on day 28 vs baseline. Responder rates were compared using noninferiority analysis.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Mean influenza titers were similar to placebo in the preceding and interrupted groups but lower in the concomitant group. The proportion of participants with influenza titers ≥40 four weeks after vaccination (seroprotection) was similar to placebo across all groups and antigens. In each treatment group, response criteria were met for 3 of 4 antigens including H1N1 and H3N2. A noninferior response was determined in the context of preceding treatment but not interrupted or concomitant treatment. Regarding PPV-23, approximately 90%-100% of participants exhibited a ≥2-fold increase in IgG concentrations vs baseline. Noninferior responder rates were determined for each siponimod treatment group.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Siponimod treatment had no relevant effect on antibody response to PPV-23. European Medicines Agency response criteria were essentially met for influenza, but titers were lower on concomitant treatment. Overall, these data suggest that siponimod has limited effect on the efficacy of vaccinations with neoantigens.
[h=4]CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:[/h] This study provides Class II evidence that in healthy persons, siponimod had limited effect on the immune response following influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations.


PMID: 28955715 PMCID: PMC5608565 DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000398
 
Back
Top Bottom