tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Jun 12. pii: S1544-3191(16)30027-9. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.03.012. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Impact of pharmacists providing immunizations on adolescent influenza immunization.[/h] Robison SG.
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To determine if the Oregon law change in 2011 to allow pharmacists to immunize adolescents 11 to 17 years of age increased influenza immunizations or changed existing immunization venues.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] With the use of Oregon's ALERT Immunization Information System (IIS), 2 measures of impact were developed. First, the change in adolescent age 11-17 influenza immunizations before (2007-2010) and after (2011-2014) the pharmacy law change was evaluated against a reference cohort (aged 7-10) not affected by the law. Community pharmacies were also compared with other types of influenza immunization sites within one of the study influenza seasons (2013-2014).
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] From 2007 to 2014, adolescent influenza immunizations at community pharmacies increased from 36 to 6372 per year. After the 2011 pharmacy law change, adolescents aged 11 to 17 were more likely to receive an influenza immunization compared with the reference population (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.22). Analysis of the 2013-2014 influenza season suggests that community pharmacies immunized a different population of adolescents than other providers.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The 2011 change in Oregon law allowed pharmacists to increase the total of influenza immunizations given to adolescents.
Copyright ? 2016 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID: 27306856 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
[h=1]Impact of pharmacists providing immunizations on adolescent influenza immunization.[/h] Robison SG.
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To determine if the Oregon law change in 2011 to allow pharmacists to immunize adolescents 11 to 17 years of age increased influenza immunizations or changed existing immunization venues.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] With the use of Oregon's ALERT Immunization Information System (IIS), 2 measures of impact were developed. First, the change in adolescent age 11-17 influenza immunizations before (2007-2010) and after (2011-2014) the pharmacy law change was evaluated against a reference cohort (aged 7-10) not affected by the law. Community pharmacies were also compared with other types of influenza immunization sites within one of the study influenza seasons (2013-2014).
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] From 2007 to 2014, adolescent influenza immunizations at community pharmacies increased from 36 to 6372 per year. After the 2011 pharmacy law change, adolescents aged 11 to 17 were more likely to receive an influenza immunization compared with the reference population (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.22). Analysis of the 2013-2014 influenza season suggests that community pharmacies immunized a different population of adolescents than other providers.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The 2011 change in Oregon law allowed pharmacists to increase the total of influenza immunizations given to adolescents.
Copyright ? 2016 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID: 27306856 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]