• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Impact of a Learning Collaborative Approach on Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization Rates in US Adults: A Mixed Methods Approach

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Jun 11. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0019. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Impact of a Learning Collaborative Approach on Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization Rates in US Adults: A Mixed Methods Approach.[/h] Ciemins EL[SUP]1[/SUP], Jerry M[SUP]2[/SUP], Powelson J[SUP]3[/SUP], Leaver-Schmidt E[SUP]4[/SUP], Joshi V[SUP]5[/SUP], Casanova D[SUP]4[/SUP], Kennedy JW[SUP]6[/SUP], Penso J[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The objective of this research was to test the impact of a learning collaborative model (intervention) on adult vaccination rates for influenza and pneumococcal disease. A mixed methods approach was used to identify changes in adult vaccination rates over time and organizational factors contributing to successful programs. Provider-level propensity scores were used to match intervention to non-intervention providers to control for inherent selection bias of participating organizations. Comparative analyses were conducted between intervention and non-intervention sites on vaccination rates, using a difference-in-differences approach. Qualitative data (eg, semi-structured interviews) were analyzed using a constant comparison approach to identify themes related to successful strategies. From 2014-2016, intervention providers demonstrated greater improvement than their matched providers in pneumococcal vaccinations (PV) for patients aged 65 years and older (treatment effect: 4.3%, P < 0.05) and PV for high-risk patients (eg, with immunocompromising conditions) aged 19-64 years (2.7%, P < 0.001). Significant effects were also observed for PV for at-risk patients (eg, with diabetes) aged 19-64 years (1.7%, P < 0.05). Individual health systems demonstrated even greater improvements (eg, greater increase in PV rates for patients aged 65 years and older), with treatment effects as high as 20.4% (P < 0.05). A learning collaborative approach was demonstrated to be an effective approach to improve adult vaccination rates among participating integrated delivery systems and medical groups. Factors associated with success included organization type (ie, integrated delivery systems) and systems characterized by a positive learning climate and collaborative culture.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] adult immunizations; learning collaborative; mixed methods; population health

PMID: 31184967 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2019.0019
 
Back
Top Bottom