• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Impact of 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza A Virus on Veterinary Students' Perception of Xenotransplantation

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Transplant Proc. 2018 Oct;50(8):2291-2295. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.178. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
[h=1]Impact of 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza A Virus on Veterinary Students' Perception of Xenotransplantation.[/h] Mart?nez-Alarc?n L[SUP]1[/SUP], R?os A[SUP]2[/SUP], Ramis G[SUP]3[/SUP], Quereda JJ[SUP]4[/SUP], Herrero JM[SUP]5[/SUP], Mendon?a L[SUP]6[/SUP], Mu?oz A[SUP]7[/SUP], Hern?ndez AM[SUP]8[/SUP], Ram?rez P[SUP]1[/SUP], Parrilla P[SUP]9[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The pandemic influenza virus A (H1N1) in 2009, which was initially associated with pigs (swine flu), could have had a negative influence on attitudes toward xenotransplantation (XT), particularly after the social alarm it caused. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of this pandemic on the acceptance of XT among veterinary science students.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A control group sample was taken of students registered in the veterinary degree course (academic year 2007-2008). For the study group, the study was repeated on the same students (year 2008-2009) after the pandemic (April 2009). Pair-matching was carried out between both groups taking into account that (1) the questionnaire was anonymous but included the student's initials and (2) when the study was repeated, the students were in the next academic year. Attitude was assessed using a validated questionnaire.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] After comparing the surveys from the control group (n = 515) and study group (n = 465), 287 matched pairs were obtained. Acceptance of organ XT did not differ significantly before and after the outbreak, assuming similar results to those using human organs (89% vs 89%; P = .10) or with a greater risk than human donation (10% vs 13%; P = .37). There was no difference between the attitude toward tissue XT before and after (94% vs 93%; P = .69) and toward cell XT (97% vs 98%; P = .30); 82% (n = 236) believed that the pandemic had not changed their perception of XT, although 43% (n = 124) considered that it had negatively affected society's perception.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The pandemic influenza virus A (H1N1) did not change the attitude of veterinary science students toward XT.
Copyright ? 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


PMID: 30316344 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.178
 
Back
Top