• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Immunol Cell Biol . Serological assays to measure dimeric IgA antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infections

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Immunol Cell Biol


. 2023 Aug 18.
doi: 10.1111/imcb.12682. Online ahead of print. Serological assays to measure dimeric IgA antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infections

Zihui Wei[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fiona Angrisano[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emily M Eriksson[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Ramin Mazhari[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Huy Van[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shuning Zheng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rob J Center[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], James McMahon[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jillian Lau[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Nicholas Kiernan-Walker[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shazia Ruybal-Pesántez[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ivo Mueller[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Leanne J Robinson[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], David A Anderson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Heidi E Drummer[SUP] 1 3 4 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Current serological tests cannot differentiate between total immunoglobulin A (IgA) and dimeric IgA (dIgA) associated with mucosal immunity. Here, we describe two new assays, dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-multiplex bead assay (MBA), that utilize the preferential binding of dIgA to a chimeric form of secretory component, allowing the differentiation between dIgA and monomeric IgA. dIgA responses elicited through severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were measured in (i) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 74 samples (n = 20 individuals) from hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); (ii) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 96 samples (n = 10 individuals) from individuals with mild COVID-19; (iii) a cross-sectional panel with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with mild COVID-19 (n = 199) and (iv) pre-COVID-19 samples (n = 200). The dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-MBA demonstrated a specificity for dIgA of 99% and 98.5%, respectively. Analysis of dIgA responses in the longitudinal panels revealed that 70% (ELISA) and 50% (MBA) of patients elicited a dIgA response by day 20 after PCR diagnosis with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals with mild COVID-19 displayed increased levels of dIgA within the first 3 weeks after diagnosis but responses appeared to be short lived, compared with sustained IgA levels. However, in samples from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 we observed high and sustained levels of dIgA, up to 245 days after PCR diagnosis. Our results suggest that severe COVID-19 infections are associated with sustained levels of plasma dIgA compared with mild cases.

Keywords: COVID-19; dIgA; mucosal immunity; serological assay.

 
Back
Top Bottom