• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Trivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccines: A Phase III, Observer-Blind, Randomized, Controlled

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Viral Immunol. 2012 Jun;25(3):216-25.
Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Trivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccines: A Phase III, Observer-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study.
Tregnaghi MW, Stamboulian D, Vanad?a PC, Tregnaghi JP, Calvari M, Fragapane E, Casula D, Pellegrini M, Groth N.
Source

1 Centro De Desarrollo De Proyectos Avanzados (CEDEPAP) , C?rdoba, Argentina .
Abstract

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of two influenza subunit vaccines, a primarily European-marketed trivalent vaccine (Agrippal(?), Novartis Vaccines), and a predominantly U.S.-marketed control trivalent vaccine (Fluvirin(?), Novartis Vaccines), in subjects aged 3-64 y. The immunogenicity of both vaccines was evaluated according to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria. This clinical trial was performed between April and December 2007 in Argentina. A total of 1893 subjects were stratified into three age groups (3-8 y, 9-17 y, and 18-64 y), and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either Agrippal or Fluvirin. Adolescents and adults received one dose of vaccine intramuscularly, whereas children aged 3-8 years received two vaccine doses, administered 4 wk apart. Antibody levels were measured by means of hemagglutination inhibition assay before vaccination (baseline); 21 d after the first vaccination (adults and adolescents); and, for children aged 3-8 y, 28 d after the first vaccination and 21 d after the second vaccine dose. Adverse reactions were solicited via diary cards for 7 d after each vaccination, and unsolicited adverse events were reported throughout the study period. Both vaccines were safe and well-tolerated, and elicited robust immunogenic responses in all age groups, meeting both CBER licensure criteria for all three viral strains after completion of the age-recommended vaccination schedule. These findings support the use of the trivalent subunit influenza vaccines Agrippal and Fluvirin for universal vaccination campaigns on an annual basis. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT00464672.

PMID:
22691101
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22691101
 
Back
Top Bottom