• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Immunogenicity and Safety of a China-Made Monovalent Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza A Vaccine in Healthcare Workers in Guangzhou, China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011 May;64(3):190-4.
Immunogenicity and Safety of a China-Made Monovalent Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza A Vaccine in Healthcare Workers in Guangzhou, China.
Zhan Y, Yang Z, Li L, Ye D, Wu H, Fu R, Zhao S, Wang Y, Zhou R, Chen R.
Source

Department of Respiratory Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China.
Abstract

Because healthcare workers played an important role in the battle against novel pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza, a clinical study was conducted to examine the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of a China-made monovalent, split-virus, pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccine in this special high-risk population. Healthcare workers in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College who received the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccine were prospectively enrolled. Antibody titers were measured at enrollment and 14 days later using hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and microneutralization assays. Adverse events were recorded within 7 days and 6 months after vaccination. Double sera were provided by 51 of 65 enrolled subjects. Postvaccination titers of 1:40 or more on HI assay were observed in 96% of recipients. Seroconversion or a significant increase in titer on HI assay occurred in 59% of subjects. The factor increase in GMTs was 4.3. The majority of complaints were mild to moderate in intensity. Although more than half of healthcare workers seemed immune to the pandemic (H1N1) influenza A virus before vaccination, most of the subjects still showed a fast, robust immune response to a single 15-μg dose of a monovalent, split-virus unadjuvanted pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza vaccine.

PMID:
21617301
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21617301
 
Back
Top Bottom