• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Immunogenicity and predictors of response to a single dose trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in multiple sclerosis patients receiving disease-modif

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018 Jul 25. doi: 10.1111/cns.13034. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Immunogenicity and predictors of response to a single dose trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in multiple sclerosis patients receiving disease-modifying therapies.[/h] Metze C[SUP]1[/SUP], Winkelmann A[SUP]1[/SUP], Loebermann M[SUP]2[/SUP], Hecker M[SUP]1[/SUP], Schweiger B[SUP]3[/SUP], Reisinger EC[SUP]2[/SUP], Zettl UK[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]AIMS:[/h] To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a seasonal influenza vaccine in a cohort of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receiving different immunomodulating/immunosuppressive therapies and assess predictors of immune response.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A prospective, multicenter, non-randomized observational study including 108 patients receiving a trivalent seasonal influenza vaccination was conducted. Influenza-specific antibody titers (H1N1, H3N2, and influenza B) were measured to evaluate rates of seroprotection and seroconversion/significant titer increase. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors of vaccination outcomes.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Regarding the whole cohort, seroprotection rates >70% were achieved for each influenza strain. Interferon-treated patients reached high seroprotection rates (>84%). Good seroprotection rates were seen in patients treated with glatiramer acetate. In particular for H3N2, response rates were low in natalizumab-treated patients and in the small subgroup of fingolimod-treated patients. Patients with a previous disease-modifying therapy and a longer disease duration were less likely to respond sufficiently. No severe adverse events were reported. MS disease activity was not increased after a one-year follow-up period.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Vaccination led to good immunogenicity, especially in MS patients treated with interferons and glatiramer acetate. At least for the H1N1 strain, rates of seroprotection and seroconversion/significant titer increase were high (>70% and >60%, respectively) for all therapeutic subgroups. Patients with a longer duration of the disease are exposed to an increased risk of insufficient immune response to vaccination.
? 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] disease-modifying therapy; immunogenicity; immunomodulation; influenza vaccine; multiple sclerosis

PMID: 30044050 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13034
 
Back
Top Bottom