• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

IJID Reg . Use of saliva as an alternative diagnostic method for diagnosis of COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
IJID Reg


. 2023 May 4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.03.011. Online ahead of print. Use of saliva as an alternative diagnostic method for diagnosis of COVID-19

Meutia Wardhanie Ganie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Irbah Rea Alvieda Nainggolan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ramadhan Bestari[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Al Hamidy Hazidar[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Mirzan Hasibuan[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jelita Siregar[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Muhammad Ichwan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], R Lia Kusumawati[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Inke Nadia Diniyanti Lubis[SUP] 8 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Mass population testing has been recommended to contain the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, the use of nasopharyngeal swab specimens has caused many logistic challenges. This study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of saliva as a non-invasively-obtained specimen for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
Methods: In total, 153 patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who had been admitted to the regional referral hospital or who self-isolated at home were included in this study. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples were collected on the same day, and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Results: The sensitivity and specificity of saliva samples were 81.5% and 76.4%, respectively, in cases that had been confirmed as COVID-19 using nasopharyngeal swab samples. Positive predictive values and negative predictive values were 92.3% and 54.1%, respectively. The highest detection rates were found among samples collected 4-7 days since symptom onset.
Conclusion: Saliva samples showed comparable performance to nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in adults. The performance of saliva as a diagnostic specimen for COVID-19 testing is particularly significant during the first week of symptoms.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Diagnosis; Indonesia; SARS-CoV-2; Saliva.

 
Back
Top Bottom