tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 11;5:18094. doi: 10.1038/srep18094.
[h=1]Identification of climate factors related to human infection with avian influenza A H7N9 and H5N1 viruses in China.[/h] Li J[SUP]1[/SUP], Rao Y[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Sun Q[SUP]4[/SUP], Wu X[SUP]5[/SUP], Jin J[SUP]6[/SUP], Bi Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Chen J[SUP]5[/SUP], Lei F[SUP]7[/SUP], Liu Q[SUP]8[/SUP], Duan Z[SUP]9[/SUP], Ma J[SUP]4[/SUP], Gao GF[SUP]1[/SUP], Liu D[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Liu W[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Human influenza infections display a strongly seasonal pattern. However, whether H7N9 and H5N1 infections correlate with climate factors has not been examined. Here, we analyzed 350 cases of H7N9 infection and 47 cases of H5N1 infection. The spatial characteristics of these cases revealed that H5N1 infections mainly occurred in the South, Middle, and Northwest of China, while the occurrence of H7N9 was concentrated in coastal areas of East and South of China. Aside from spatial-temporal characteristics, the most adaptive meteorological conditions for the occurrence of human infections by these two viral subtypes were different. We found that H7N9 infections correlate with climate factors, especially temperature (TEM) and relative humidity (RHU), while H5N1 infections correlate with TEM and atmospheric pressure (PRS). Hence, we propose a risky window (TEM 4-14 ?C and RHU 65-95%) for H7N9 infection and (TEM 2-22 ?C and PRS 980-1025 kPa) for H5N1 infection. Our results represent the first step in determining the effects of climate factors on two different virus infections in China and provide warning guidelines for the future when provinces fall into the risky windows. These findings revealed integrated predictive meteorological factors rooted in statistic data that enable the establishment of preventive actions and precautionary measures against future outbreaks.
PMID: 26656876 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
[h=1]Identification of climate factors related to human infection with avian influenza A H7N9 and H5N1 viruses in China.[/h] Li J[SUP]1[/SUP], Rao Y[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Sun Q[SUP]4[/SUP], Wu X[SUP]5[/SUP], Jin J[SUP]6[/SUP], Bi Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Chen J[SUP]5[/SUP], Lei F[SUP]7[/SUP], Liu Q[SUP]8[/SUP], Duan Z[SUP]9[/SUP], Ma J[SUP]4[/SUP], Gao GF[SUP]1[/SUP], Liu D[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Liu W[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Human influenza infections display a strongly seasonal pattern. However, whether H7N9 and H5N1 infections correlate with climate factors has not been examined. Here, we analyzed 350 cases of H7N9 infection and 47 cases of H5N1 infection. The spatial characteristics of these cases revealed that H5N1 infections mainly occurred in the South, Middle, and Northwest of China, while the occurrence of H7N9 was concentrated in coastal areas of East and South of China. Aside from spatial-temporal characteristics, the most adaptive meteorological conditions for the occurrence of human infections by these two viral subtypes were different. We found that H7N9 infections correlate with climate factors, especially temperature (TEM) and relative humidity (RHU), while H5N1 infections correlate with TEM and atmospheric pressure (PRS). Hence, we propose a risky window (TEM 4-14 ?C and RHU 65-95%) for H7N9 infection and (TEM 2-22 ?C and PRS 980-1025 kPa) for H5N1 infection. Our results represent the first step in determining the effects of climate factors on two different virus infections in China and provide warning guidelines for the future when provinces fall into the risky windows. These findings revealed integrated predictive meteorological factors rooted in statistic data that enable the establishment of preventive actions and precautionary measures against future outbreaks.
PMID: 26656876 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]