• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

IDCases . False-negative rate of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests and its relationship to test timing and illness severity: A case series

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
IDCases


. 2022;28:e01496.
doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2022.e01496. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
False-negative rate of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests and its relationship to test timing and illness severity: A case series


Hidenori Takahashi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Naoki Ichinose[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yasusei Okada[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the false-negative rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results, and to describe the characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with false-negative results.
Methods: We validated SARS-CoV-2-positive RT-PCR test results performed in hospitalized patients between February 1 and August 31, 2020 and classified the patients according to disease severity.
Results: In total, 2038 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests were performed on 1890 patients. Of these, 145 patients had positive results and were diagnosed with COVID-19. Among the 145 patients with COVID-19, the initial RT-PCR tests were negative in five patients. Of these, three had moderate illness and were initially tested in the early stage of disease, and two had severe illness and were initially tested in the late stage of disease, when RT-PCR testing has lower sensitivity due to viral clearance.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that false-negative results can be caused by both observer errors and by low viral RNA levels in the later stages of disease, after the infection has cleared. Clinicians should be aware that patients with COVID-19 can have negative RT-PCR test results in the later stages of infection.

Keywords: COVID-19; False-negative result; Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity.
 
Back
Top Bottom