• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Hum Vaccin Immunother . Serological assessment of the durability of vaccine-mediated protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother


. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2308375.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2308375. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Serological assessment of the durability of vaccine-mediated protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection

John T Bates[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Seth T Lirette[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Andrew P Farmer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michael A Bierdeman[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kristina B Seyfarth[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dallas R Ederer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Denise D Montgomery[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Grace C Burnett[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amanda T Pham[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gailen D Marshall[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Virus-neutralizing antibodies are often accepted as a correlate of protection against infection, though questions remain about which components of the immune response protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this small observational study, we longitudinally measured spike receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific and nucleocapsid (NP)-specific serum IgG in a human cohort immunized with the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine. NP is not encoded in the vaccine, so an NP-specific response is serological evidence of natural infection. A greater than fourfold increase in NP-specific antibodies was used as the serological marker of infection. Using the RBD-specific IgG titers prior to seroconversion for NP, we calculated a protective threshold for RBD-specific IgG. On average, the RBD-specific IgG response wanes below the protective threshold 169 days following vaccination. Many participants without a history of a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection seroconverted for NP-specific IgG. As a group, participants who seroconverted for NP-specific IgG had significantly higher levels of RBD-specific IgG following NP-seroconversion. RBD-specific IgG titers may serve as one correlate of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. These titers wane below the proposed protective threshold approximately six months following immunization. Based on serological evidence of infection, the frequency of breakthrough infections and consequently the level of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity in the population may be higher than what is predicted based on the frequency of documented infections.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antibody response; breakthrough infection; vaccine; waning immunity.

 
Back
Top Bottom