• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Hum Vaccin Immunother . Parental preference for live-attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccination in children: A questionnaire survey

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother


. 2026 Dec;22(1):2646002.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2026.2646002. Epub 2026 Mar 18.
Parental preference for live-attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccination in children: A questionnaire survey

Taito Kitano[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nami Kurosawa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shinji Hirano[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Takumi Okamura[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Soshi Hachisuka[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Naohiro Yamamoto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hiroki Nishikawa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Masayuki Onaka[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rika Suzuki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sayaka Yoshida[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Understanding parental attitudes and factors influencing selection of influenza vaccines, including live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), provides insights into optimizing influenza vaccine uptake. This online survey evaluated parental knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding influenza vaccination for children and examined the impact of providing vaccine-related information on vaccine selection in Nara, Japan where LAIV was recently introduced. Parents of children aged 2 to 18 y reported vaccination preference before and after reviewing standardized vaccine-related information and provided reasons for vaccine selection. In total, 237 parents answered the questionnaire for 302 children. After review of the vaccine information, 27.8% of parents planned vaccination with IIV and 66.2% planned vaccination with LAIV. Preference for LAIV increased significantly after information review compared with baseline (p < .001). Common reasons for LAIV preference included lack of a second dose requirement (92.4%), absence of injection-related pain (74.0%), and expectation of mucosal immunity development (32.8%). Reasons for IIV preference included no prior experience with LAIV (38.2%), higher cost of LAIV (32.7%), and familiarity with IIV (23.6%). Provision of vaccine information increased parental preference for LAIV for their children, suggesting that improved communication may support greater uptake of LAIV.

Keywords: IIV; LAIV; Live-attenuated influenza vaccine; inactivated influenza vaccine; online questionnaire; respiratory tract infection; survey; vaccine effectiveness; vaccine hesitancy; vaccine safety.

 
Back
Top Bottom