• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Hum Vaccin Immunother . Immunogenicity evaluation of ChAdox1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in solid cancer patients in Chulabhorn Hospital

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother


. 2022 Aug 17;2104058.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2104058. Online ahead of print.
Immunogenicity evaluation of ChAdox1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in solid cancer patients in Chulabhorn Hospital


Piyarat Limpawittayakul[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Prakongboon Sungkasubun[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Worawit Chaiwiriyawong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Archara Supavavej[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bowon Weerasubpong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jomtana Siripaibun[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chumut Phanthunane[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wisut Lamlertthon[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Teerapat Ungtrakul[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kriangkrai Tawinprai[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Walaipan Tantiyavarong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chayanee Samdaengpan[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer patients are more vulnerable to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) owing to their compromised immune status. However, data regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety and immune response in cancer patients are scarce.
Method: This prospective, age- and sex-matched, single-center cohort study included 61 cancer patients and 122 healthy control participants. Seropositivity was defined as anti-S IgG titer >0.8 units/ml. Primary end point was seroconversion rate of immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein (anti-S IgG) in cancer patients vs. healthy control participants following the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222).
Results: After the second-dose vaccination, there was no difference in seropositivity rate between groups (57 [93.44%] patients with cancer vs. 121 [99.18%] control participants; geometric mean ratio [GMR]: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.01-10.46; p-value = 0.571). In contrast, after the first-dose vaccination, the seropositivity rate was significantly lower in the cancer patients than in the control participants (50/61 [81.97%] vs. 121/122 [99.18%]; GMR: 0.07; 95%CI: 0.01-0.71; p = 0.025). The median anti-S IgG titer after the first-and second dose vaccination were not significantly different between groups. Female sex was significantly associated with a higher anti-S IgG titer. 5FU- and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were associated with a lower IgG titer. Side effects of vaccination were tolerable.
Conclusions: The anti-S IgG seropositivity rate after completing the second vaccine dose did not differ between the cancer patients and control participants. However, the anti-S IgG seropositivity rate after the first-dose vaccination was lower in cancer patients.

Keywords: AZD1222; ChAdox1 nCov-19; seropositivity; solid cancer; titer; vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom