• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Hum Vaccin Immunother . Differences in COVID-19-related hospitalization burden between kidney transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients vacci

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother


. 2026 Dec;22(1):2615506.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2026.2615506. Epub 2026 Jan 22.
Differences in COVID-19-related hospitalization burden between kidney transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients vaccinated against COVID-19

Abelardo Claudio Fernández-Chávez[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Guillermo Yovany Ordoñez-León[SUP] 2 [/SUP], María Ysabel Mendoza-Gómez[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel Leonardo Sánchez-Carmona[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jesús María Aranaz-Andrés[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and hemodialysis (HD) patients are highly vulnerable to COVID-19. The degree of protection after mRNA vaccination remains uncertain. Observational, prospective cohort (non-probability convenience sample) of adults under care in a Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (29 Feb 2020-30 May 2022) who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Outcomes were ≥1 COVID-19-related hospitalization and ≥1 ICU admission. We fitted multivariable logistic regression models (reporting odds ratios [OR] with 95% CIs) adjusted for age (years, linear), sex, and number of vaccine doses (0-4); vaccination was summarized as cumulative doses. IPTW was estimated for baseline diagnostics only; negative-binomial models were used as sensitivity analyses. Calendar time/variant epochs were not included. No patient received passive immunization. 810 patients were analysed (KTR = 679; HD = 131). Adjusted odds of hospitalisation were not significantly different between KTR and HD (OR:1.19; 95%CI:0.70-2.01). For ICU admission, the KTR vs HD estimate was imprecise due to very few events (OR:5.48; 95%CI:0.70-43.09). Age increased hospitalisation odds (OR per year:1.02; 95%CI:1.01-1.04). A dose-response pattern was observed: for hospitalisation, the third dose was associated with lower odds (OR:0.40; 95%CI:0.17-0.97) and the fourth dose showed a borderline reduction (OR:0.43; 95%CI:0.18-1.06); for ICU admission, third and fourth doses were associated with markedly lower odds (OR:0.15; 95%CI:0.04-0.54, OR:0.12; 95%CI:0.03-0.47). We found no clear differences between KTR and HD in the odds of COVID-19-related hospitalisation or ICU admission after vaccination. Findings support active surveillance and booster-focused immunisation in both groups. Although passive immunisation was not evaluated, current recommendations suggest selected patients may benefit from it when available.

Keywords: COVID-19; Immunosuppression; hemodialysis; kidney transplant recipients; vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom