• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

How has the flu virus infected the Web? 2010 influenza and vaccine information available on the Internet

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 29;13(1):83. [Epub ahead of print]
How has the flu virus infected the Web? 2010 influenza and vaccine information available on the Internet.
Covolo L, Mascaretti S, Caruana A, Orizio G, Caimi L, Gelatti U.
Abstract
ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND: The 2009--10 influenza pandemic was a major public health concern. Vaccination was recommended by the health authorities, but compliance was not optimal and perception of the presumed associated risks was high among the public.The Internet is increasingly being used as a source of health information and advice.The aim of the study was to investigate the characteristics of websites providing information about flu vaccine and the quality of the information provided.
METHODS:

Website selection was performed in autumn 2010 by entering eight keywords in two of the most commonly used search engines (Google.com and Yahoo.com).The first three result pages were analysed for each search, giving a total of 480 occurrences. Page rank was evaluated to assess visibility.Websites based on Web 2.0 philosophy, websites merely displaying popular news/articles and single files were excluded from the subsequent analysis. We analysed the selected websites (using WHO criteria) as well as the information provided, using a codebook for pro/neutral websites and a qualitative approach for the adverse ones.
RESULTS:

Of the 89 websites selected, 54 dealt with seasonal vaccination, three with anti-H1N1 vaccination and 32 with both.Rank analysis showed that only classic websites (ones not falling in any other category) and one social network were provided on the first pages by Yahoo; 21 classic websites, six displaying popular news/articles and one blog by Google.Analysis of the selected websites revealed that the majority of them (88.8%) had a positive/neutral attitude to flu vaccination. Pro/neutral websites distinguished themselves from the adverse ones by some revealing features like greater transparency, credibility and privacy protection.
CONCLUSIONS:

We found that the majority of the websites providing information on flu vaccination were pro/neutral and gave sufficient information. We suggest that antivaccinationist information may have been spread by a different route, such as via Web 2.0 tools, which may be more prone to the dissemination of "viral" information.The page ranking analysis revealed the crucial role of search engines regarding access to information on the Internet.

PMID:
23360311
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Free full text

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23360311
 
Back
Top Bottom