• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
The absence of a sugary viral shield could explain why immune responses to the 1918 influenza virus also work against the 2009 H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic strain.

Researchers have found that the two viruses, although separated in time by nearly a century, are structurally similar in a region that is recognized by the immune system. In seasonal flu viruses, that region ? a part of the haemagglutinin protein often used to create flu vaccines ? is dotted with sugar molecules; however, the two pandemic flu strains lack this sweet spot. This might explain why seasonal flu vaccines don't protect against swine flu.


http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100...y+(NatureNews+-+All+articles+published+today)
 
Re: How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

1918 and 2009 flu similarity could help yield vaccine: study
(AFP) ? 3 hours ago

WASHINGTON ? A pandemic flu virus from 1918 is markedly similar to last year's H1N1 strain, according to a study published Wednesday, which scientists said could help in the creation of new vaccines.

The research was published in the online journal Science Translational Medicine said.

"This study defines an unexpected similarity between two pandemic-causing strains of influenza," said Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

"It gives us a new understanding of how pandemic viruses evolve into seasonal strains, and, importantly, provides direction for developing vaccines to slow or prevent that transformation," Fauci said.

Researchers at the NIAID and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) injected mice with a vaccine made from inactivated 1918 influenza virus, then exposed them to high levels of the 2009 H1N1 virus.

All of the vaccinated mice survived.

The scientists then repeated the experiment, this time vaccinating the mice with inactivated 2009 H1N1 virus and exposing them to high concentrations of the 1918 virus. Again, the mice survived.

The "surprising" finding is that either pandemic virus could be used to create a vaccine that caused the mice to produce antibodies capable of neutralizing the other.
[...]

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ikUgdhqtQDNf2OisEFhhMbPMjdgA
 
Re: How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

> Fauci said.
> Researchers at the NIAID and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813279/pdf/ppat.1000745.pdf
Mount Sinai

http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=141080


makes me wonder whether there is competion between the institutes.
Researcher from one institute preferrably quoting researchers from the
same institute, trying to ignore results from other institutes.
Also Racaniello interviewing Palese,Garcia-Sastre but not Webster,
Kawaoka, or researchers from other countries.

someone please make a study whether researchers preferrably quote
researchers from the same institute !
uhh, that someone could be me ... downloading all records from pubmed...
 
Re: How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

#1: "the two viruses, although separated in time by nearly a century, are structurally similar in a region that is recognized by the immune system"

#2: "The scientists then repeated the experiment, this time
vaccinating the mice with inactivated 2009 H1N1 virus and exposing them to high concentrations of the 1918 virus. Again, the mice survived."


so,
to one pandemic strain AH1N1
the immune reaction will be "always"
as to another pandemic AH1N1

CORO.:
than we need not to bother about the new versions of pandemic2009 if it remains stil an AH1N1, so no need for changed vaccines production ...

could it be realy?
 
Re: How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

it prevents mice from dying.
Humans may still get sick.

1918-vax or 1976 vax may give ome protection
but actual CA/07 vax gives more protection

a study about how well the 1976-vax did protect against
****** is underway said Garcia Sastre (as I understood)


maybe half as well as the CA/07 vax, I guesstimate


but it seems that H3N2 is changing more, is evading the vaccine
more successfully
 
Re: How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

gs it is hardly surprising that people from the same institute who have worked together in the past are going to find it easier to talk to, get quotes from and be aware of - and trust - the work of each other.

Sastre - if I understood him correctly from his TWiV interview - was of the opinion that exposure to H1N1, prior to its replacement by the 1957 pandemic, gives some protection.
The argument goes like this. The new H1(2009) is similar to the pre 1957 H1. The current - up to last year - seasonal H1N1 strains were so different from the the H1N1 that reigned from 1918 to 1957 that they afforded little or no protection. In fact, in the absence of sequence data, based solely on HA serology they would probably not even have been classified as H1 and we would now have an H17. The 1918 H1N1 led to both H1N1 in humans and pigs. In pigs the selection pressures for HA change were less (probably due to short life span and constrained mobility) which led to the H1(2009) being more H1(1918) like than season H1 like. Also the human H1(circa 1956) was closer to the H1 in swine than it was to recent seasonal H1s. The net result is the elderly who had H1N1 pre '57 have had an easier ride this pandemic. In the recent paper comparing the total years of life lost they gave seasonal H3N2's average age of fatal cases as over 75 years and H1N1(2009) as under 40.
There are some problems with this argument. Personally I am not sure I have had flu since 1968 and I am not sure what would be regarded as an average gap between flu bouts so how many of the over 53s would actually have had H1N1 in their youth and, after all this time, how effective would that protection be, given that a generally poor immune response in the elderly is usually sited as the reason for vaccine failure and flu's high death rate in this age group. Although H1N1 disappeared in 1957 it reappeared in 1977 and had not changed at all over the 20 year gap (possibly due to a lab release of a 1950's strain - it did not cause a pandemic presumably due to herd immunity from the over 20s). As it would not then instantly change protection from 1977 on should have been as good as for the time up to '57 and should only have slowly petered of as it diverged from the relatively static swine HA. If the match was good for just 3 years then anyone who had H1 based flu prior to 1980 should have some protection - so we are now talking about the over 30s. The 1977 reintroduction was a single strain so all sequence divergence stems from that point. How many H1 strains were circulating when the '57 pandemic hit and was the '77 strain the one best matched to give H1(2009) protection? If it was a poor match then post '77 infection may not have been much help.
Just some thoughts.
 
Re: How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

<CITE><ABBR class=slug-jnl-abbrev title="Science Translational Medicine">Sci Transl Med</ABBR> 24 March 2010:
Vol. 2, Issue 24, p. 24ra21


DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000799 </CITE>
  • Research Article
Cross-Neutralization of 1918 and 2009 Influenza Viruses: Role of Glycans in Viral Evolution and Vaccine Design


Chih-Jen Wei<SUP>1</SUP>,
Jeffrey C. Boyington<SUP>1</SUP>,
Kaifan Dai<SUP>1</SUP>,
Katherine V. Houser<SUP>2</SUP>,
Melissa B. Pearce<SUP>2</SUP>,
Wing-Pui Kong<SUP>1</SUP>,
Zhi-yong Yang<SUP>1</SUP>,
Terrence M. Tumpey<SUP>2</SUP> and
Gary J. Nabel<SUP>1</SUP>,*
+ Author Affiliations<SUP></SUP>
<SUP>1</SUP>Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892?3005, USA. <SUP>2</SUP>Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gnabel@nih.gov

Abstract


New strains of H1N1 influenza virus have emerged episodically over the last century to cause human pandemics, notably in 1918 and recently in 2009. Pandemic viruses typically evolve into seasonal forms that develop resistance to antibody neutralization, and cross-protection between strains separated by more than 3 years is uncommon. Here, we define the structural basis for cross-neutralization between two temporally distant pandemic influenza viruses?from 1918 and 2009. Vaccination of mice with the 1918 strain protected against subsequent lethal infection by 2009 virus. Both were resistant to antibodies directed against a seasonal influenza, A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (1999 NC), which was insensitive to antisera to the pandemic strains. Pandemic strain?neutralizing antibodies were directed against a subregion of the hemagglutinin (HA) receptor binding domain that is highly conserved between the 1918 and the 2009 viruses. In seasonal strains, this region undergoes amino acid diversification but is shielded from antibody neutralization by two highly conserved glycosylation sites absent in the pandemic strains. Pandemic HA trimers modified by glycosylation at these positions were resistant to neutralizing antibodies to wild-type HA. Yet, antisera generated against the glycosylated HA mutant neutralized it, suggesting that the focus of the immune response can be selectively changed with this modification. Collectively, these findings define critical determinants of H1N1 viral evolution and have implications for vaccine design. Immunization directed to conserved receptor binding domain subregions of pandemic viruses could potentially protect against similar future pandemic viruses, and vaccination with glycosylated 2009 pandemic virus may limit its further spread and transformation into a seasonal influenza.

Footnotes


Citation: C.-J. Wei, J. C. Boyington, K. Dai, K. V. Houser, M. B. Pearce, W.-P. Kong, Z-y.. Yang, T. M. Tumpey, G. J. Nabel, Cross-neutralization of 1918 and 2009 influenza viruses: Role of glycans in viral evolution and vaccine design. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 24ra21 (2010).


  • Received December 31, 2009.
  • Accepted March 4, 2010.
  • Copyright ? 2010, American Association for the Advancement of Science
Read the Full Text
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:

 
Re: How 1918 flu antibodies fend off swine flu

not quoting from all available data makes them less trustworthy,
makes them look biased

the antigenic divergence mainly started in the 30s or 40s
according to the MtSinai study
(which I happen to have read)

different strains were co-circulating. H2N2 killed them all
 
Back
Top Bottom