• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Hospitalised patients with suspected 2009 H1N1 Influenza A in a hospital in Norway, July - December 2009.

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
The main objective of this study was to describe the patients who were hospitalised at Oslo University Hospital Aker during the first wave of pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Norway.

Methods: Clinical data on all patients hospitalised with influenza-like illness from July to the end of November 2009 were collected prospectively.

Patients with confirmed H1N1 Influenza A were compared to patients with negative H1N1 tests.

Results: 182 patients were hospitalised with suspected H1N1 Influenza A and 64 (35%) tested positive.

Seventeen patients with positive tests (27%) were admitted to an intensive care unit and four patients died (6%). The H1N1 positive patients were younger, consisted of a higher proportion of non-ethnic Norwegians, had a higher heart rate on admission, and fewer had pre-existing hypertension, compared to the H1N1 negative patients.

However, hypertension was the only medical condition that was significantly associated with a more serious outcome defined as ICU admission or death, with a univariate odds ratio of the composite endpoint in H1N1 positive and negative patients of 6.1 (95% CI 1.3-29.3) and 3.2 (95% CI 1.2-8.7), respectively. Chest radiography revealed pneumonia in 24/59 H1N1 positive patients.

63 of 64 H1N1 positive patients received oseltamivir.

Conclusions: The extra burden of hospitalisations was relatively small and we managed to admit all the patients with suspected H1N1 influenza without opening new pandemic isolation wards.

The morbidity and mortality were similar to reports from comparable countries. Established hypertension was associated with more severe morbidity and patients with hypertension should be considered candidates for vaccination programs in future pandemics.

Author: Bjorn BrandsaeterMagnus PillgramDag BerildHarald KjekshusAnne-Marte KranBente Bergersen
Credits/Source: BMC Infectious Diseases 2011, 11:75


http://7thspace.com/headlines/37679..._hospital_in_norway_july___december_2009.html
 
Back
Top Bottom