• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Hong Kong Med J . The real-world impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with cancer: a multidisciplinary cross-sectional survey

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hong Kong Med J


. 2023 Apr 14.
doi: 10.12809/hkmj219326. Online ahead of print.
The real-world impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with cancer: a multidisciplinary cross-sectional survey


K K H Bao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], K M Cheung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], J C H Chow[SUP] 1 [/SUP], C W L Leung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], K H Wong[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented disruptions to cancer care worldwide. We conducted a multidisciplinary survey of the real-world impact of the pandemic, as perceived by patients with cancer.
Methods: A total of 424 patients with cancer were surveyed using a 64-item questionnaire constructed by a multidisciplinary panel. The questionnaire examined patient perspectives regarding COVID-19-related effects (eg, social distancing measures) on cancer care delivery, resources, and healthcare-seeking behaviour, along with the physical and psychosocial aspects of patient well-being and pandemic-related psychological repercussions.
Results: Overall, 82.8% of respondents believed that patients with cancer are more susceptible to COVID-19; 65.6% expected that COVID-19 would delay anti-cancer drug development. Although only 30.9% of respondents felt that hospital attendance was safe, 73.1% expressed unaltered willingness to attend scheduled appointments; 70.3% of respondents preferred to receive chemotherapy as planned, and 46.5% were willing to accept changes in efficacy or side-effect profile to allow an outpatient regimen. A survey of oncologists revealed significant underestimation of patient motivation to avoid treatment interruptions. Most surveyed patients felt that there was an insufficient amount of information available concerning the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care, and most patients reported social distancing-related declines in physical, psychological, and dietary wellness. Sex, age, education level, socio-economic status, and psychological risk were significantly associated with patient perceptions and preferences.
Conclusion: This multidisciplinary survey concerning the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic revealed key patient care priorities and unmet needs. These findings should be considered when delivering cancer care during and after the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Pandemics; Physical distancing; Stress disorders, post-traumatic.
 
Back
Top