Re: Homologous Recombination is Very Rare or Absent in Human Influenza A Virus
The sequences represent reality. Your pictures support your hypothesis, which is not supported by the data, which probably produces considerable confusion for those trying to understand recombination.
If you post a comparison of the Daejeon/2002 with an H3N2 from 2002, the recombination in the middle third will be obvious.
The paper with the recombination examples described the vast majority (over 300) as short stretches, which would involve two cross overs. Two cross-overs are also involved in the vast majority of single nucleotide polymorphism switches when closely related seqeunces recombine.
The examples in the sequence database are clear. Your model of one cross over has no experimental (or conceptual) support.
I'm not sure why you think this is relevant, since the Korean sequences clearly have two breakpoints, which is why the beginning and end of the gene look like contempory H3N2, and only the middle third looks like the isolates from a decade earlier.here are some more pictures :
http://www.setbb.com/fluwiki2/viewtopic.php?p=842&mforum=fluwiki2
the clearest recombination-signal is from the Denmark/2003 sequence.
My program usually only considers one breakpoint so these
are not so easily found then.
Also, it lists only the best candidate (Habana) for one virus
(Daejeon) and then omits other candidates (1992).
The p-value for the 1992 sequences is not so small.
Also, when you remove the "c" , which are non-synonymous and
can be explained by immunity-avoiding, then the picture is less clear.
Code:outer/? middle/1992 \ | \ | \ / \ / / \/___recombination / | / Daejeon/2002 / Denmark/2003
or
Code:middle? \ \ Daejeon/2002 \ / \/____recombination | | Denmark/2003
or even 2 recombinations, one before Daejeon/2002 and one after Daejeon/2002 ?
The sequences represent reality. Your pictures support your hypothesis, which is not supported by the data, which probably produces considerable confusion for those trying to understand recombination.
If you post a comparison of the Daejeon/2002 with an H3N2 from 2002, the recombination in the middle third will be obvious.
The paper with the recombination examples described the vast majority (over 300) as short stretches, which would involve two cross overs. Two cross-overs are also involved in the vast majority of single nucleotide polymorphism switches when closely related seqeunces recombine.
The examples in the sequence database are clear. Your model of one cross over has no experimental (or conceptual) support.