• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

High Risk of Influenza Virus Infection Among Swine Workers: Examining a Dynamic Cohort in China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 1. pii: ciz865. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz865. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]High Risk of Influenza Virus Infection Among Swine Workers: Examining a Dynamic Cohort in China.[/h] Borkenhagen LK[SUP]1[/SUP], Wang GL[SUP]2[/SUP], Simmons RA[SUP]1[/SUP], Bi ZQ[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Lu B[SUP]5[/SUP], Wang XJ[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Wang CX[SUP]6[/SUP], Chen SH[SUP]5[/SUP], Song SX[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Li M[SUP]6[/SUP], Zhao T[SUP]2[/SUP], Wu MN[SUP]2[/SUP], Park LP[SUP]1[/SUP], Cao WC[SUP]2[/SUP], Ma MJ[SUP]2[/SUP], Gray GC[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]7,[/SUP][SUP]8[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2 State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China. 3 Shandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, China. 4 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, China. 5 Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi, China. 6 Licheng District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, China. 7 Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China. 8 Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] China is thought to be a hotspot for zoonotic influenza virus emergence, yet there have been few prospective studies examining the occupational risk of such infections.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] We present the first two years of data collected from a five-year, prospective cohort study of swine-exposed and unexposed participants, pigs, and six swine farms in China. We conducted serological and virological surveillance to examine evidence for swine influenza A virus infection in humans.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Two hundred and seven (31.5%) of the 658 participants (521 swine-exposed and 137 unexposed), enrolled at any time period, seroconverted against at least one SIV subtype (swine H1N1 or H3N2). Swine-exposed participants' microneutralization titers, especially those enrolled at confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), were higher against the swine H1N1 virus than were other participants at 12 and 24 months. Despite elevated titers, among the 187 study subjects for whom we had complete follow-up, participants working at swine CAFOs had significantly greater odds of seroconverting against both swine H1N1 (OR 19.16; 95% CI 3.55, 358.65) and swine H3N2 (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.16, 8.01) viruses compared to unexposed and non-CAFO swine workers with less intense swine exposure.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] While some of the observed increased risk against swine viruses may have been explained by exposure to human influenza strains, study data suggest that even with elevated preexisting antibodies, swine-exposed workers are at high risk of infection with enzootic swine influenza A viruses.
? The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] epidemiology; influenza A virus; swine influenza; zoonoses

PMID: 31504322 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz865
 
Back
Top Bottom