• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Heliyon . Feasibility analysis of inactivating influenza A(H1N1) virus using UVC robot in classroom environment

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Heliyon


. 2024 Apr 15;10(8):e29540.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29540. eCollection 2024 Apr 30. Feasibility analysis of inactivating influenza A(H1N1) virus using UVC robot in classroom environment

Yizhen Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Peiyao Guo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dekun Luo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jianyu Deng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Huilu Yao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wenhong Sun[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Starting from 2009, H1N1 has been one of the respiratory diseases that afflict the global population. Concurrently, due to the influence of COVID-19, it has become widely accepted that preventing the virus's spread necessitates personal protection measures and disinfection in public spaces.
Experiments: This study conducted two experiments. In the classroom experiment, six UVC dose test points were calibrated to test whether the UVC dose at each testing point met the standards for inactivating IAVs and the time required to meet the standards. In the simulated classroom experiment, seven square slides made of IAVs were placed. After 10 min of robot movement, irradiated sterile square slides were made into suspension and injected into chicken embryos. Cultivate chicken embryos and conduct IAVs testing.
Results: Classroom experiment has shown that 5 testing points can meet the standards for inactivating IAVs(3 mJ/cm[SUP]2[/SUP]), with a required time of 80 min, 40 min, 15 min, 5 min and 10 min. The UVC dose for testing points that do not meet the standards in 80 min is only 0.5 mJ/cm[SUP]2[/SUP]. The simulation classroom experiment outcomes revealed that 99.99 % of IAVs were deactivated. Furthermore, this study established both a desktop control group and a chair arm control group, both of which yielded identical results, indicating an inactivation logarithm of IAVs≥4log.
Conclusion: The study presented that IAVs on the surface of an object can be effectively and rapidly deactivated at an irradiation density of 1.8 mW/cm[SUP]2[/SUP]. Meanwhile, the study provides evidence of the feasibility of using the GXU robot to inactivate IAVs in a classroom environment.

Keywords: Classroom environment; Deep ultraviolet LED; Influenza A; Influenza A virus; Robot; Robot technology; UVC; Virus inactivation.

 
Back
Top Bottom