• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Healthcare (Basel) . A Direct Method for RT-PCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Healthcare (Basel)


. 2021 Jan 4;9(1):E37.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010037.
A Direct Method for RT-PCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples


Sherif A El-Kafrawy[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Mai M El-Daly[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ahmed M Hassan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Reham M Kaki[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Adel M Abuzenadah[SUP] 1 2 4 [/SUP], Mohammad A Kamal[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Esam I Azhar[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic of acute respiratory disease (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-strand RNA virus and its genomic characterization has played a vital role in the design of appropriate diagnostics tests. The current RT-PCR protocol for SARS-CoV-2 detects two regions of the viral genome, requiring RNA extraction and several hours. There is a need for fast, simple, and cost-effective detection strategies.
Methods: we optimized a protocol for direct RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 without the need for nucleic acid extraction. Nasopharyngeal samples were diluted to 1:3 using diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water. The diluted samples were incubated at 95 ?C for 5 min in a thermal cycler, followed by a cooling step at 4 ?C for 5 min. Samples then underwent reverse transcription real-time RT-PCR in the E and RdRp genes.
Results: our direct detection protocol showed 100% concordance with the standard protocol with an average Ct value difference of 4.38 for the E region and 3.85 for the RdRp region.
Conclusion: the direct PCR technique was found to be a reliable and sensitive method that can be used to reduce the time and cost of the assay by removing the need for RNA extraction. It enables the use of the assay in research, diagnostics, and screening for COVID-19 in regions with fewer economic resources, where supplies are more limited allowing for wider use for screening.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; direct RT-PCR; molecular detection.
 
Back
Top Bottom