• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Health Sci Rep . Estimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Health Sci Rep


. 2021 May 3;4(2):e274.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.274. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Estimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Tanvir Ahammed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aniqua Anjum[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mohammad Meshbahur Rahman[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Najmul Haider[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Richard Kock[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Md Jamal Uddin[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background and aims: Realizing the transmission potential and the magnitude of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) aids public health monitoring, strategies, and preparation. Two fundamental parameters, the basic reproduction number (R [SUB]0[/SUB]) and case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19, help in this understanding process. The objective of this study was to estimate the R [SUB]0[/SUB] and CFR of COVID-19 and assess whether the parameters vary in different regions of the world.
Methods: We carried out a systematic review to find the reported estimates of the R [SUB]0[/SUB] and the CFR in articles from international databases between January 1 and August 31, 2020. Random-effect models and Forest plots were implemented to evaluate the mean effect size of R [SUB]0[/SUB] and the CFR. Furthermore, R [SUB]0[/SUB] and CFR of the studies were quantified based on geographic location, the tests/thousand population, and the median population age of the countries where the studies were conducted. To assess statistical heterogeneity among the selected articles, the I [SUP]2[/SUP] statistic and the Cochran's Q test were used.
Results: Forty-five studies involving R [SUB]0[/SUB] and 34 studies involving CFR were included. The pooled estimation of R [SUB]0[/SUB] was 2.69 (95% CI: 2.40, 2.98), and that of the CFR was 2.67 (2.25, 3.13). The CFR in different regions of the world varied significantly, from 2.49 (2.08, 2.94) in Asia to 3.40 (2.81, 4.04) in North America. We observed higher mean CFR values for the countries with lower tests (3.15 vs 2.16) and greater median population age (3.13 vs 2.27). However, R [SUB]0[/SUB] did not vary significantly in different regions of the world.
Conclusions: An R [SUB]0[/SUB] of 2.69 and a CFR of 2.67 indicate the severity of the COVID-19. Although R [SUB]0[/SUB] and CFR may vary over time, space, and demographics, we recommend considering these figures in control and prevention measures.

Keywords: COVID?19; basic reproduction number; case fatality rate; meta?analysis; systematic review.
 
Back
Top Bottom