• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Health Commun . How Does WHO's COVID-19 Response Build and Challenge the Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Evidence-Base?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Health Commun


. 2026 Mar;41(3):472-484.
doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2446972. Epub 2026 Feb 12.
How Does WHO's COVID-19 Response Build and Challenge the Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Evidence-Base?

Marsha L Vanderford[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

This analysis reviews articles appearing in the special issue of Health Communication, "WHO Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) lessons learned from COVID-19" through a lens of previous RCCE research and their implications for future practice. The successes and challenges presented by the World Health Organization (WHO) headquarters, regions, and partners are compared to recommendations and conclusions of the most recent WHO RCCE guideline, Communicating risk during public health emergencies: A WHO guideline for emergency risk communication (ERC) policy and practice. The Guideline includes the only official WHO evidence-based recommendations for RCCE practice, based on meta-syntheses of relevant literature through 2015. This analysis considered whether RCCE interventions undertaken during COVID-19 added strength to previous recommendations, filled evidence gaps, contradicted or added nuance to endorsements and conclusions, or pointed RCCE in new directions for future practice.


 
Back
Top