• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Health Aff (Millwood) . Increased Intensity Of PCR Testing Reduced COVID-19 Transmission Within Countries During The First Pandemic Wave

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Health Aff (Millwood)


. 2020 Dec 2;101377hlthaff202001409.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01409. Online ahead of print.
Increased Intensity Of PCR Testing Reduced COVID-19 Transmission Within Countries During The First Pandemic Wave


Ravindra Prasan Rannan-Eliya[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nilmini Wijemunige[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jrna Gunawardana[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sarasi N Amarasinghe[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ishwari Sivagnanam[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sachini Fonseka[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Yasodhara Kapuge[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Chathurani P Sigera[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Experts agree that reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is critical in controlling coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but decision-makers disagree on how much testing is optimal. Controlling for interventions and ecological factors, we used linear regression to quantify testing's impact on COVID-19's average reproduction number, representing transmissibility, in 173 countries and territories, accounting for 99% of the world's COVID-19 cases, during March to June 2020. Amongst interventions, PCR testing had the greatest influence-a ten-fold increase in the ratio of tests to new cases reported reduced the average reproduction number by 9% across a range of testing levels. Our results imply that mobility reductions (e.g., shelter-in-place orders) were less effective in developing countries than in developed countries. Our results help explain how some nations achieved near-elimination of COVID-19 and the failure of lockdowns to slow COVID-19 in others. Our findings suggest that World Health Organization and other testing benchmarks are insufficient for COVID-19 control. Increased testing and isolation may represent the most effective, least costly alternative in terms of money, economic growth and human life for controlling COVID-19. [Editor's Note: This Fast Track Ahead Of Print article is the accepted version of the peer-reviewed manuscript. The final edited version will appear in an upcoming issue of Health Affairs
 
Back
Top Bottom