• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Has estimation of numbers of cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 in England in 2009 provided a useful measure of the occurrence of disease?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2011 May 9. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00259.x. [Epub ahead of print]
Has estimation of numbers of cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 in England in 2009 provided a useful measure of the occurrence of disease?
Evans B, Charlett A, Powers C, McLean E, Zhao H, Bermingham A, Smith G, Wreghitt T, Andrews N, Pebody R, Watson JM.
Source

Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London, UK. Real-time Syndromic Surveillance Team, HPA West Midlands, Birmingham, UK. Regional HPA Laboratory, Clinical Microbiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract

Please cite this paper as:  Evans et al. (2011) Has estimation of numbers of cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 in England in 2009 provided a useful measure of the occurrence of disease? Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00259.x. Background  Surveillance indicators of influenza activity have generally provided robust comparative trend data for England. These indicators became less reliable, however, for monitoring trends in activity, or comparisons with previous years, during the influenza pandemic in 2009 because of changes in the perception of risk and changes in the systems of healthcare delivery. An approach was developed to estimate the number of cases of influenza-like illness (ILI) occurring because of infection with pandemic influenza virus. Methods and findings  The number of cases was estimated each week in England on the basis of total number of patients consulting healthcare services with ILI; estimates of the proportion of individuals in the community experiencing an ILI-seeking health care; and the proportion of these positive on laboratory testing. Almost 800 000 cases (range 375 000-1?6 million) of symptomatic ILI cases were estimated to have occurred over the course of the two waves of pandemic activity in England. More cases were estimated to have occurred in the second wave than in the first. Conclusions  These results underestimate the total number of infections as they do not include asymptomatic infections nor those with mild illness not meeting the definition of a case of ILI. Nevertheless, the case number estimates provide a useful indicator of the trend in influenza activity and weekly data were extensively used in media reports. Although surveillance methods differ between countries, the approach of synthesising available data sources to produce an overall estimate of case numbers could be applied more widely to provide comparative data.

? 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

PMID:
21668667
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21668667
 
Back
Top Bottom