• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Global warming: the final verdict

Re: Global warming: the final verdict

The Lancet 2006; 367:859-869
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3
Review
Climate change and human health: present and future risks

Prof Anthony J McMichael PhD a , Rosalie E Woodruff PhD a and Simon Hales PhD b

Summary

There is near unanimous scientific consensus that greenhouse gas emissions generated by human activity will change Earth's climate.

The recent (globally averaged) warming by 0·5°C is partly attributable to such anthropogenic emissions. Climate change will affect human health in many ways—mostly adversely. Here, we summarise the epidemiological evidence of how climate variations and trends affect various health outcomes. We assess the little evidence there is that recent global warming has already affected some health outcomes. We review the published estimates of future health effects of climate change over coming decades. Research so far has mostly focused on thermal stress, extreme weather events, and infectious diseases, with some attention to estimates of future regional food yields and hunger prevalence. An emerging broader approach addresses a wider spectrum of health risks due to the social, demographic, and economic disruptions of climate change. Evidence and anticipation of adverse health effects will strengthen the case for pre-emptive policies, and will also guide priorities for planned adaptive strategies.


Affiliations

a. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia
b. University of Otago, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wellington, New Zealand

Correspondence to: Professor A J McMichael
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Global warming: the final verdict

Global Warming, The New York Times April 6, 2007

On Feb. 2, 2007, the United Nations scientific panel studying climate change declared that the evidence of a warming trend is "unequivocal," and that human activity has "very likely" been the driving force in that change over the last 50 years. The last report by the group, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in 2001, had found that humanity had "likely" played a role.

The addition of that single word "very" did more than reflect mounting scientific evidence that the release of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases from smokestacks, tailpipes and burning forests has played a central role in raising the average surface temperature of the earth by more than 1 degree Fahrenheit since 1900. It also added

new momentum to a debate that now seems centered less over whether humans are warming the planet, but instead over what to do about it.

In recent months, business groups have banded together to make unprecedented calls for federal regulation of greenhouse gases. The subject had a red-carpet moment when former Vice President Al Gore's documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," was awarded an Oscar; and the Supreme Court made its first global warming-related decision, ruling 5 to 4 that the Environmental Protection Agency had not justified its position that it was not authorized to regulate carbon dioxide.

The greenhouse effect has been part of the earth's workings since its earliest days. Gases like carbon dioxide and methane allow sunlight to reach the earth, but prevent some of the resulting heat from radiating back out into space. Without the greenhouse effect, the planet would never have warmed enough to allow life to form.

But as ever larger amounts of carbon dioxide have been released along with the development of industrial economies, the atmosphere has grown warmer at an accelerating rate: Since 1970, temperatures have gone up at nearly three times the average for the 20th century.

The latest report from the climate panel predicted that the global climate is likely to rise between 3.5 and 8 degrees Fahrenheit if the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere reaches twice the level of 1750. By 2100, sea levels are likely to rise between 7 to 23 inches, it said, and the changes now underway will continue for centuries to come.

Articles and multimedia about global warming published in The New York Times appear below, along with a Navigator with links to Web sites with more information.

More About Global Warming From The Learning Network
 
Re: Global warming: the final verdict

Apr 7, 2:55 AM (ET)

By CAIN BURDEAU

(AP) Dr. William Gray, a top hurricane researcher, answers questions during an interview in New Orleans,...
Full Image



NEW ORLEANS (AP) - A top hurricane forecaster called Al Gore "a gross alarmist" Friday for making an Oscar-winning documentary about global warming.

"He's one of these guys that preaches the end of the world type of things. I think he's doing a great disservice and he doesn't know what he's talking about," Dr. William Gray said in an interview with The Associated Press at the National Hurricane Conference in New Orleans, where he delivered the closing speech.

A spokeswoman said Gore was on a flight from Washington, D.C., to Nashville Friday; he did not immediately respond to Gray's comments.

Gray, an emeritus professor at the atmospheric science department at Colorado State University, has long railed against the theory that heat-trapping gases generated by human activity are causing the world to warm.

Over the past 24 years, Gray, 77, has become known as America's most reliable hurricane forecaster; recently, his mentee, Philip Klotzbach, has begun doing the bulk of the forecasting work.

Gray's statements came the same day the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change approved a report that concludes the world will face dire consequences to food and water supplies, along with increased flooding and other dramatic weather events, unless nations adapt to climate change.

Rather than global warming, Gray believes a recent uptick in strong hurricanes is part of a multi-decade trend of alternating busy and slow periods related to ocean circulation patterns. Contrary to mainstream thinking, Gray believes ocean temperatures are going to drop in the next five to 10 years.

Gore's documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," has helped fuel media attention on global warming.

Kerry Emanuel, an MIT professor who had feuded with Gray over global warming, said Gray has wrongly "dug (his) heels in" even though there is ample evidence that the world is getting hotter.
 
Re: Global warming: the final verdict

In the early 21st century, it's become clear that air pollution can significantly reduce the amount of sunlight reaching Earth, lower temperatures, and mask the warming effects of greenhouse gases. Climate researcher James Hansen estimates that "global dimming" is cooling our planet by more than a degree Celsius (1.8?F) and fears that as we cut back on the pollution that contributes to dimming, global warming may escalate to a point of no return. Regrettably, in terms of possibly taking corrective action, our current understanding of global dimming has been a long time in the coming, considering the first hints of the phenomenon date back to 18th-century observations of volcanic eruptions. In this slide show, follow a series of historic events and scientific milestones that built the case for global dimming. Click on the image at left to begin.?Susan K. Lewis




Thanks to Spencer Weart of the American Institute of Physics, whose book The Discovery of Global Warming made this feature possible. A hypertext version of the book can be found at www.aip.org/history/climate/
 
Re: Global warming: the final verdict

ITEM 1
In the early 21st century, it's become clear that air pollution can significantly reduce the amount of sunlight reaching Earth, lower temperatures, and mask the warming effects of greenhouse gases. Climate researcher James Hansen estimates that "global dimming" is cooling our planet by more than a degree Celsius (1.8?F) and fears that as we cut back on the pollution that contributes to dimming, global warming may escalate to a point of no return. Regrettably, in terms of possibly taking corrective action, our current understanding of global dimming has been a long time in the coming, considering the first hints of the phenomenon date back to 18th-century observations of volcanic eruptions. In this slide show, follow a series of historic events and scientific milestones that built the case for global dimming. Click on the image at left to begin.?Susan K. Lewis

Thanks to Spencer Weart of the American Institute of Physics, whose book The Discovery of Global Warming made this feature possible. A hypertext version of the book can be found at www.aip.org/history/climate/

ITEM 2
Temperature
John Baez
October 1, 2006
Global warming is changing the world we know and love. But in fact, the Earth's climate has changed many times - especially in the last two million years, when a series of ice ages has wreaked havoc worldwide. We need to understand the past to have any chance of understanding the future... so here's a little tale of the Earth's climate. If you prefer charts to words, scroll down!
Though the Earth's temperature has been varying ever since its birth, I'll start my story at the beginning of the Cenozoic Era. The Cenozoic - the age of mammals - began with a bang around 65 million years ago when an asteroid smacked into Mexico and the dinosaurs died out. The Cenozoic is divided as follows:
? Paleogene: 65 - 24 million years ago.
o Paleocene Epoch: 65 - 55 million years ago.
o Eocene Epoch: 55 - 34 million years ago.
o Oligocene Epoch: 34 - 24 million years ago.
? Neogene: 24 - 0 million years ago.
o Miocene Epoch: 24 - 5.3 million years ago.
o Pliocene Epoch: 5.3 - 1.8 million years ago.
o Pleistocene Epoch: 1.8 - .01 million years ago.
o Holocene Epoch: .01 - 0 million years ago.
Though the beginning of the Cenozoic - the Paleocene - was cooler than the hottest part of the Paleozoic, it was much warmer than today. Oxygen isotope ratios show the ocean was 10? to 15? Celsius warmer than today. For Americans who know nothing of metric units, that's 18?-27? Fahrenheit warmer than now. That's hot!
55 million years ago, at the very end of the Paleocene there was an drastic incident called the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. You can see it as the spike labelled "PETM" on this graph. Ocean surface temperatures worldwide shot up by 5-8?C for a few thousand years - but in the Arctic, it heated up even more, to a balmy 23?C (73?F). This caused a severe dieoff of little ocean critters called foraminifera, and a drastic change of the dominant mammal species. What caused this? Maybe a sudden release of greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide from volcanos, or a "methane burp" released from gas hydrates on the sea floor. People have indeed found drastically different carbon isotope ratios at this time.
At the start of the Eocene, the continents were close to where they are now, but the average annual temperature in arctic Canada and Siberia was a balmy 18? C (65? F). The dominant plants up there were palm trees and cycads. Fossil monitor lizards (sort of like alligators) dating back to this era have been found in Svalbard, an island north of Greenland that's now covered with ice all year. Antarctica was home to cool temperate forests, including beech trees and ferns. In particular, our Earth had no permanent polar ice caps!
Life back then was very different than now. The biggest member of the order Carnivora, which now includes dogs, cats, bears, and the like, was merely the size of a housecat. The largest predatory mammals were creodonts, the size of wolves. But the biggest predator of all was not a mammal - it was Diatryma, the 8-foot tall "terror bird", with a fearsome beak! For more on this strange world and its end as the Earth cooled, see:
? Donald R. Prothero, The Eocene-Oligocene Transition: Paradise Lost, Critical Moments in Paleobiology and Earth History Series, Columbia University Press, New York, 1994.
The temperature began to drop rapidly in the middle of the Eocene. By the Oligocene, 34-24 million years ago, glaciers started forming in Antarctica. The growth of ice sheets led to a dropping of the sea level. Tropical jungles gave ground to cooler woodlands.
What caused this? Some seek the answers in plate tectonics. The Oligocene is when India collided with Asia, throwing up the Himalayas and the vast Tibetan plateau. Some argue this led to a significant change in global weather patterns. But this is also the time when the supercontinent Gondwanaland finally broke up, with Australia and South America separating from Antarctica. Some argue that the formation of an ocean completely surrounding Antarctica led to the cooling weather patterns.
The beginning of the Miocene, 24 million years ago, is when grasses first became common. It's sort of amazing that something we take so much for granted - grass - can be so new! But grasslands, as opposed to thicker forests and jungles, are characteristic of cooler climates. And as Nigel Calder has suggested, grasslands were crucial to the development of humans! We grew up on the border between forests and grasslands. That has a lot to do with why we stand on our hind legs and have hands rather than paws. Later, the agricultural revolution relied heavily on grasses like wheat, rice, corn, sorghum, rye, and millet. As we ate more of these plants, we drastically transformed them by breeding. In return, they drastically transformed us: the ability to stockpile surplus grains ended our hunter-gatherer lifestyle and gave rise to cities, kingdoms, and slave labor.
So, you could say we coevolved with grasses!
Indeed, the sequence of developments leading to humans came shortly after the first grasses. Apes split off from monkeys 21 million years ago, in the Miocene. The genus Homo split off from other apes like gorillas and chimpanzees 5 million years ago, near the beginning of the Pliocene. The fully bipedal Home erectus dates back to 1.9 million years ago, near the end of the Pliocene.
Then, at the beginning of the Pleistocene, 1.8 million years ago, the Earth entered an even cooler phase, with jerky temperature variations causing a series of ice ages. Experts call them "glacials", and call the intervening periods "interglacials".
The latest glacial began around 70,000 years ago. As you probably know, people were around then. The Neanderthalers died out 35 thousand years ago, and the oldest cave paintings are 32 thousand years old. The glaciers reached their maximum extent around 21 thousand years ago, with ice sheets down to the Great Lakes and mouth of the Rhine, and covering the British Isles. Around 16 thousand years ago it started seriously warming up, and temperatures reached their present levels around 10 thousand years ago. We can see this from oxygen isotopes in ice from Greenland, and we can see it from the rise of sea levels.
In September 2006, scientists from NASA, Columbia University and elsewhere published a paper on climate change which shows, among other things, a graph of the Earth's temperature over the last million years or so. You can see a bunch of glacials on this chart. You can see that the temperature is now becoming hotter than since the end of the last glacial. With just one more degree Celsius of warming, it'll be hotter than ever in the last million years.
In other words, we may be witnessing the end of the whole cycle of ice ages!
As we get closer to the present the data gets more accurate and we can spot small fluctuations on top of larger trends - this is one reason it feels that things are happening faster. Though things have basically been warming up in the last 16 thousand years, there was a severe cold spell between 12.9 and 11.5 thousand years ago: the Younger Dryas event.
(I love that name! It comes from the tough little Arctic flower Dryas octopetala, whose plentiful pollen in certain ice samples gave evidence that this time period was chilly. Before the Younger Dryas there was a warm spell called the Aller?d, and before that a cold period called the Older Dryas.)
Anyway, the Younger Dryas lasted about 1400 years. Temperatures dropped dramatically in Europe: about 7?C in only 20 years! In Greenland, it was 15? C colder during the Younger Dryas than today. In England, the average annual temperature was -5? C, so glaciers started forming. We can see evidence of this event from oxygen isotope records and many other things.
Why the sudden chill? One theory is that the melting of the ice sheet on North America lowered the salinity of North Atlantic waters. This in turn blocked a current called the "Atlantic thermohaline circulation", or the Conveyor Belt for short, which normally brings warm water up the coast of Europe. Proponents of this theory argue that this current is what makes London much warmer than, say, Winnipeg in Canada or Irkutsk in Russia. Turn it off and - wham! - you'll get glaciers forming in England.
So, ironically, global warming may have brought on a sudden deep freeze in Europe. Some scientists are worried that we could be in for a repeat of the Younger Dryas if we keep melting the Arctic ice sheets at the rate we're doing now. For more, try:
? Terrence Joyce, Abrupt Climate Change: Are We on the Brink of a Little Ice Age?, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
? National Research Council, Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable Surprises, National Academy Press, 2002.
? Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall, An abrupt climate change scenario and its implications for the United States national security. (A report commissioned by the U. S. Defense Department.)
? Michael Vellinga and Richard A. Wood, Global climatic impacts of a collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation, in Climate Change 54 (2002), 251-267.
? Spencer Weart, Rapid climate change, in The Discovery of Global Warming, Harvard U. Press, Cambridge, 2003.
? Richard A. Wood, Michael Vellinga and Robert Thorpe, Global warming and thermohaline circulation stability, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 361 (2003), 1961-1975.
On the other hand, some very respected scientists don't believe this theory of the Younger Dryas. For a fascinating discussion of the other view, try:
? Mark Bowen, Thin Ice: Unlocking the Secrets of Climate in the World's Highest Mountains, Henry Holt & Co., 2005.
This talks about Lonnie Thompson, who studied ice cores from glaciers on tropical mountains. According to these cores, the impact of the Younger Dryas was even bigger far away from the North Atlantic. And, Thompson and others believe the importance of the North Atlantic as the Achilles heel of the climate system has been greatly exaggerated.
It's also questionable how important the Atlantic thermohaline circulation really is for the mild climate of Europe. It could just be the wind flow patterns! For a great discussion of this, try:
? Richard Seager, The source of Europe's mild climate, American Scientist, July-August 2006.
If a collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation didn't cause the Younger Dryas, what did? I wish I knew.
Anyway, the Younger Dryas ended as suddenly at it began, with temperatures jumping 7? C. Since then, the Earth continued warming up until about 6 thousand years ago - the mid-Holocene thermal maximum. The earth was about 1? or 2? Celsius warmer than today. Since then, it's basically been cooling off - not counting various smaller variations.
But as we zoom in towards the present, we see more and more tiny details....
From 6000 to 2500 years ago things cooled down, with the coolest stretch occuring between 4000 and 2500 years ago: the Iron Age neoglaciation.
Then things warmed up for a while, and then they cooled down from 500 to 1000 AD. Yes, the so-called "Dark Ages" were also chilly!
After this came the Medieval climate optimum, a period from about 1000 to 1300 AD during which European temperatures reached their warmest levels for the last 4000 years.
From 1450 AD to 1890 there was a period of cooling, often called the Little Ice Age. This killed off the Icelandic colonies in Greenland, as described in this gripping book:
? Jane Smiley, The Greenlanders, Ballantine Books, New York, 1996.
However, the term "Little Ice Age" exaggerates the importance of what's truly a tiny blip in the grand scheme of things. It was nowhere near as big as the Younger Dryas: temperatures may have dropped a measly 0.2? Celsius from the Medieval optimum, and it may have happened only in Europe - though this is a subject of debate.
Since then, things have been warming up. The subject has big political implications, and is thus subject to enormous controversy. But, I think it's safe to say this warming is much greater than the other variations I've mentioned over the last 1000 years. The most accepted data shows Northern Hemisphere temperatures rising about 1.1? Celsius from 1900 to 2000.
More recently, in 2005, the National Climatic Data Center prepared a graph of the world's temperature from 1880 to 2005. It shows overall temperatures rising a bit more than 1? Celsius. It also shows that 1998 is the hottest year on record, followed by 2005. In 1998 there was an El Ni?o to blame for the heat; in 2005 there was not!
Lots of other studies have been done, and most of them roughly agree.
Of course, 1 Celsius ain't much compared to the 15?-20? Celsius cooling throughout the Cenozoic - but it's happening fast, and and it's not over yet! With all the changes the Earth has experienced over its history, one might think one more change is no big deal. In the long run, yes. But the future of humanity depends crucially on what happens in the "short run": the next millennium or two. If we didn't mess around with the climate, our Earth's climate might remain stable for another thousand years or more. As it is, we're bringing on more sudden changes.
Next, here's some of the data - charts of the Earth's climate, starting with the long-term history of the Earth, then zooming in towards the present.
Temperatures over the last 4.6 billion years

Here "Ma" means "million years ago". This chart was drawn from many sources; I got it from:
? Barry Saltzman, Dynamical Paleoclimatology: Generalized Theory of Global Climate Change, Academic Press, New York, 2002, fig. 1-3.

Deep ocean temperatures over the last 100 million years


These temperatures are estimated by the amount of oxygen-18; they're based on the 1981 work of Douglas and Woodruff, but I got this chart from:
? Joe Buchdahl, Cenozoic Climates, in Global Climate Change Student Guide.
Note the ancient past is to the right on this graph. One can see how the Earth has cooled throughout the Cenozoic, which began 65 million years ago.

Temperatures over the last 65 million years



This shows the Earth's temperature since the extinction of the dinosaurs about 65 million years ago - the end of the Mesozoic and beginning of the Cenozoic. At first the Earth warmed up, reaching its warmest 50 million years ago: the "Eocene Optimum". The spike before that labelled "PETM" is a fascinating event called the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. At the end of the Eocene the Earth cooled rapidly and the Antarctic acquired year-round ice. After a warming spell near the end of the Oligocene, further cooling and an increasingly jittery climate led ultimately to the current age of rapid glacial cycles - "ice ages".
This chart is taken from here:
? Robert Rohde, 65 million years of climate change, for Global Warming Art.
Global ice mass over the last 6 million and 1 million years

The amount of ice is estimated by the amount of oxygen-18. In these charts up means "cold"! I got these charts from:
? Barry Saltzman, Dynamical Paleoclimatology: Generalized Theory of Global Climate Change, Academic Press, New York, 2002, fig. 1-4.
Conditions have become increasingly chilly and erratic in the Pleistocene - the last 1.8 million years. In the last 1 million years we see about ten Ice Ages, though it's hard to say what counts as an Ice Age.

Ocean temperatures over the last 2.5 million years


These temperatures are estimated by the amount of oxygen-18; I got this chart from:
? Joe Buchdahl, Pleistocene Glacials and Interglacials, in Global Climate Change Student Guide.
The larger fluctuations are Ice Ages, mostly during the Pleistocene Epoch, which began 1.8 million years ago.

Temperatures over the last 1.35 million years


Note this timeline is not to scale! According to this study, after warming up 0.2? C per year for the last 3 decades, the Earth is now the hottest it's been in the last 12,000 years:
? James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Ken Lo, David W. Lea, and Martin Medina-Elizade, Global temperature change, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103 (2006), 14288-14293.
The current temperature matches the "Holocene maximum", a warm period about 12,000 years ago, right before the last ice age. If the temperature goes up another 1?C, it'll be the hottest it's been in the last 1.35 million years!
Temperatures over the last 1 million, 150 thousand, 16 thousand and 150 years


Here "ka" is an abbreviation for "thousands of years ago". These temperatures are estimated by various methods; I got this chart from:
? Barry Saltzman, Dynamical Paleoclimatology: Generalized Theory of Global Climate Change, Academic Press, New York, 2002, fig. 3-4.
As we keep zooming in towards the present we keep seeing more detail:
? Over the last million years there have been about ten Ice Ages - though counting Ice Ages is a bit like counting "really deep valleys" in a hilly landscape.
? From 150 to 120 thousand years ago it warmed up rather rapidly. From 120 thousand years ago to 16 thousand years ago it cooled down - that was the last Ice Age. Then it warmed up rather rapidly again.
? Over the last 10 thousand years temperatures have been unusually constant.
? Over the last 150 years it's been warming up slightly.

Sea levels over the last 150,000 years


Higher sea levels correspond to warmer temperatures, since these make the ice caps melt. I got this chart from:
? Joe Buchdahl, Pleistocene Glacials and Interglacials, in Global Climate Change Student Guide.
The dip in sea levels from 120 to 20 thousand years ago is due to the last Ice Age.

Greenland temperatures over the last 130,000 years


These temperatures are estimated by the amount of oxygen-18 in an ice core taken from Camp Century, Greenland. The curve has been smoothed to eliminate short-term fluctuations; it's based on the 1986 work of Dansgaard et al, but I got this chart from:
? Joe Buchdahl, Pleistocene Glacials and Interglacials, in Global Climate Change Student Guide.
The colder period is the last Ice Age.

Greenland temperatures over the last 100,000 years


This chart is based on ice cores, taken from:
? Arctic Council, Impacts of a Warming Climate: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2004.

Greenland temperatures over the last 20,000 years


These temperatures are estimated by the amount of oxygen-18 in an ice core taken from Camp Century, Greenland. The curve has been smoothed to eliminate short-term fluctuations; it's based on the 1987 work of Boyle and Keigwin, but I got this chart from:
? Joe Buchdahl, The Younger Dryas Event, in Global Climate Change Student Guide.
The cooling from approximately 11 to 10 thousand years ago is called the "Younger Dryas" event. (Other sources give the dates as about 13-11 thousand years ago.)

Greenland temperatures over the last 18,000 years


This chart is based on ice cores, taken from:
? Richard B. Alley, The Two-Mile Time Machine: Ice Cores, Abrupt Climate Change, and our Future, Princeton U. Press, Princeton, 2002.
This is a good book for learning how people reconstruct the history of temperatures in Greenland from looking at a two-mile-long ice core drilled out of the glaciers there.

World temperatures over the last 10,000 years


I got this chart from:
? Joe Buchdahl, Mid-Holocene Thermal Maximum, Global Climate Change Student Guide.
After the Younger Dryas it warmed up for a while. The warm spell from 7 to 6 thousand years ago is called the "Holocene thermal maximum". After that it cooled again.

Temperature in the Northern Hemisphere over the last 1000 years


This is taken from
? Millenial Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstruction, adapted from Mann, Bradley and Hughes by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for their report Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis.
The warming since 1850 is evident here, as is the "Little Ice Age" around 1450.

World temperatures from 1880 to 2005




The temperature for 2005 only is based on 11 months of data; this will be fixed later. The first chart is from the Los Angeles Times:
? Usha Lee McFarling and Miguel Bustillo, 2005 Vying With '98 as Record Hot Year, Los Angeles Times, December 16, 2005, figure by Leslie Carlson.
It's based on the same data as the second chart, which comes from here:
? National Climatic Data Center, Climate of 2005 - in Historical Perspective, 2005.

Greenland temperatures over the last 100 years


This chart is based on direct observations, taken from:
? Arctic Council, Impacts of a Warming Climate: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2004.

Greenland: melting in 1992 versus in 2002

These charts are taken from:
? Arctic Council, Impacts of a Warming Climate: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2004.

Text ? 2006 John Baez; charts copyrighted by those who created them
baez@math.removethis.ucr.andthis.edu
home
 
There is too much $$$ at stake for rational/non-political discourse

There is too much $$$ at stake for rational/non-political discourse

The Washington Post

The Tempest<o:p></o:p>

By Joel Achenbach
<st1:date month="5" day="28" year="2006">Sunday, May 28, 2006</st1:date>; W08<o:p></o:p>


As evidence mounts that humans are causing dangerous changes in Earth's climate, a handful of skeptics are providing some serious blowback<o:p></o:p>

IT SHOULD BE GLORIOUS TO BE BILL GRAY, professor emeritus. He is often called the World's Most Famous Hurricane Expert. He's the guy who, every year, predicts the number of hurricanes that will form during the coming tropical storm season. He works on a country road leading into the <st1:place>Front Range</st1:place> of the <st1:place>Rocky Mountains</st1:place>, in the atmospheric science department of <st1:place><st1:placename>Colorado</st1:placename><st1:placetype>State</st1:placetype><st1:placetype>University</st1:placetype></st1:place>. He's mentored dozens of scientists. By rights, Bill Gray should be in deep clover, enjoying retirement, pausing only to collect the occasional lifetime achievement award.<o:p></o:p>
He's a towering figure in his profession and in person. He's 6 feet 5 inches tall, handsome, with blue eyes and white hair combed straight back. He's still lanky, like the baseball player he used to be back at <st1:place><st1:placename>Woodrow</st1:placename><st1:placename>Wilson</st1:placename><st1:placename>High School</st1:placename></st1:place> in <st1:state><st1:place>Washington</st1:place></st1:state> in the 1940s. When he wears a suit, a dark shirt and tinted sunglasses, you can imagine him as a casino owner or a <st1:place>Hollywood</st1:place> mogul. In a room jammed with scientists, you'd probably notice him first.<o:p></o:p>
He's loud. His laugh is gale force. His personality threatens to spill into the hallway and onto the chaparral. He can be very charming.<o:p></o:p>

But he's also angry. He's outraged.<o:p></o:p>

He recently had a public shouting match with one of his former students. It went on for 45 minutes.<o:p></o:p>

He was supposed to debate another scientist at a weather conference, but the organizer found him to be too obstreperous, and disinvited him.<o:p></o:p>

Much of his government funding has dried up. He has had to put his own money, more than $100,000, into keeping his research going. He feels intellectually abandoned. If none of his colleagues comes to his funeral, he says, that'll be evidence that he had the courage to say what they were afraid to admit.<o:p></o:p>

Which is this: Global warming is a hoax.<o:p></o:p>

"I am of the opinion that this is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people," he says when I visit him in his office on a sunny spring afternoon.<o:p></o:p>

He has testified about this to the United States Senate. He has written magazine articles, given speeches, done everything he could to get the message out. His scientific position relies heavily on what is known as the Argument From Authority. He's the authority.<o:p></o:p>

"I've been in meteorology over 50 years. I've worked **** hard, and I've been around. My feeling is some of us older guys who've been around have not been asked about this. It's sort of a baby boomer, yuppie thing."<o:p></o:p>
Gray believes in the obs. The observations. Direct measurements. Numerical models can't be trusted. Equation pushers with fancy computers aren't the equals of scientists who fly into hurricanes.<o:p></o:p>

"Few people know what I know. I've been in the tropics, I've flown in airplanes into storms. I've done studies of convection, cloud clusters and how the moist process works. I don't think anybody in the world understands how the atmosphere functions better than me."<o:p></o:p>

In just three, five, maybe eight years, he says, the world will begin to cool again.<o:p></o:p>
We sit in his office for 2 1/2 hours, until the sun drops behind the mountains, and when we're done he offers to keep talking until <st1:time hour="0" minute="0">midnight</st1:time>. He is almost desperate to be heard. His time is short. He is 76 years old. He is howling in a maelstrom.<o:p></o:p>

Parallel Earths<o:p></o:p>

HUMAN BEINGS ARE PUMPING GREENHOUSE GASES INTO THE ATMOSPHERE, warming the planet in the process.<o:p></o:p>
Since the dawn of the industrial era, atmospheric carbon dioxide has risen steadily from about 280 to about 380 parts per million. In the past century, the average surface temperature of Earth has warmed about 1 degree Fahrenheit. Much of that warming has been in the past three decades. Regional effects can be more dramatic: The Arctic is melting at an alarming rate. Arctic sea ice is 40 percent thinner than it was in the 1970s. Glaciers in <st1:place>Greenland</st1:place> are speeding up as they slide toward the sea. A recent report shows <st1:place>Antarctica</st1:place> losing as much as 36 cubic miles of ice a year.<o:p></o:p>
The permafrost is melting across broad swaths of <st1:state><st1:place>Alaska</st1:place></st1:state>, <st1:country-region><st1:place>Canada</st1:place></st1:country-region> and <st1:place>Siberia</st1:place>. Tree-devouring beetles, common in the American Southwest, are suddenly ravaging the evergreen forests of <st1:state><st1:place>British Columbia</st1:place></st1:state>. Coral reefs are bleaching, scalded by overheated tropical waters. There appear to have been more strong hurricanes and cyclones in recent decades, Category 3 and higher -- such as Katrina.<o:p></o:p>

The 1990s were the warmest decade on record. The year 1998 set the all-time mark. This decade is on its way to setting a new standard, with a succession of scorchers. The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a global effort involving hundreds of climate scientists and the governments of 100 nations, projected in 2001 that, depending on the rate of greenhouse gas emissions and general climate sensitivities, the global average temperature would rise 2.5 to 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit between 1990 and 2100. Sea levels could rise just a few inches, or nearly three feet.<o:p></o:p>

All of the above is part of the emerging, solidifying scientific consensus on global warming -- a consensus that raises the urgent political and economic issue of climate change. This isn't a theory anymore. This is happening now. Business as usual, many scientists say, could lead to a wildly destabilized climate for the first time since the dawn of human civilization.<o:p></o:p>

But when you step into the realm of the skeptics, you find yourself on a parallel Earth.<o:p></o:p>
It is a planet where global warming isn't happening -- or, if it is happening, isn't happening because of human beings. Or, if it is happening because of human beings, isn't going to be a big problem. And, even if it is a big problem, we can't realistically do anything about it other than adapt.<o:p></o:p>


snip


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR2006052301305_pf.html
 
Re: Global warming: the final verdict

It is quite apparent that this topic can not be discussed without politics and seems to engender emotional reactions that I have seen with similar discussions regarding weapons.

This is a humanitarian site that is committed to help lessen morbidity and mortality.

We will accept nothing less.

Many find our site difficult to understand. We are neither left or right. Democrat or Republican. Socialist or Conservative.

We are all.

In the last year we have managed to irritate all political parties and sides of the issues. But one truth remains evident to us -

All souls are equal.

Our continuing stand will always be to speak the truth and to empower those whom the world has forgotten.


S.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top