tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Global Health
. 2022 Aug 8;18(1):76.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00864-y.
Perceptions and knowledge regarding the COVID-19 pandemic between U.S. and China: a mixed methods study
Yutang Xiong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Xingran Weng[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Bethany Snyder[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Lin Ma[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Menglong Cong[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Erin L Miller[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Lauren Jodi Van Scoy[SUP] 3 7 8 [/SUP], Robert P Lennon[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: SARS-CoV-2, a new coronavirus first reported by China on December 31st, 2019, has led to a global health crisis that continues to challenge governments and public health organizations. Understanding COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) is key for informing messaging strategies to contain the pandemic. Cross-national studies (e.g.: comparing China to the U.S.) are needed to better understand how trans-cultural differences may drive differences in pandemic response and behaviors. The goal of the study is to compare knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 between adults in China and the U.S. These data will provide insight into challenges these nations may face in coordinating pandemic response.
Methods: This is a convergent mixed methods study comparing responses from China and the U.S. to a multinational COVID-19 KAP online survey. The survey included five quantitative constructs and five open-ended questions. Chinese respondents (n = 56) were matched for gender, age, education, perceived social standing, and time of survey completion with a U.S. cohort (n = 57) drawn from 10,620 U.S.
Respondents: Quantitative responses were compared using T-test & Fisher-Exact tests. Inductive thematic analysis was applied to open-ended questions.
Results: Both U.S. and Chinese samples had relatively high intention to follow preventive behaviors overall. Differences in intended compliance with a specific recommendation appear to be driven by the different cultural norms in U.S. and China. Both groups expressed trepidation about the speed of COVID-19 vaccine development, driven by concern for safety among Chinese respondents, and concern for efficacy among U.S.
Respondents: The Chinese cohort expressed worries about other countries' passive handling of the pandemic while the U.S. cohort focused on domestic responses from individuals and government. U.S. participants appeared more knowledgeable on some aspects of COVID-19. Different perspectives regarding COVID-19 origins were identified among the two groups. Participants from both samples reported high trust in health professionals and international health organizations.
Conclusions: Mixed methods data from this cross-national analysis suggests sociocultural differences likely influence perceptions and knowledge of COVID-19 and its related public health policies. Discovering and addressing these culturally-based differences and perceptions are essential to coordinate a global pandemic response.
Keywords: COVID-19; Mixed methods; Public messaging; Sociocultural differences; U.S. and China.
. 2022 Aug 8;18(1):76.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00864-y.
Perceptions and knowledge regarding the COVID-19 pandemic between U.S. and China: a mixed methods study
Yutang Xiong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Xingran Weng[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Bethany Snyder[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Lin Ma[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Menglong Cong[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Erin L Miller[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Lauren Jodi Van Scoy[SUP] 3 7 8 [/SUP], Robert P Lennon[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35941625
- DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00864-y
Abstract
Background: SARS-CoV-2, a new coronavirus first reported by China on December 31st, 2019, has led to a global health crisis that continues to challenge governments and public health organizations. Understanding COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) is key for informing messaging strategies to contain the pandemic. Cross-national studies (e.g.: comparing China to the U.S.) are needed to better understand how trans-cultural differences may drive differences in pandemic response and behaviors. The goal of the study is to compare knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 between adults in China and the U.S. These data will provide insight into challenges these nations may face in coordinating pandemic response.
Methods: This is a convergent mixed methods study comparing responses from China and the U.S. to a multinational COVID-19 KAP online survey. The survey included five quantitative constructs and five open-ended questions. Chinese respondents (n = 56) were matched for gender, age, education, perceived social standing, and time of survey completion with a U.S. cohort (n = 57) drawn from 10,620 U.S.
Respondents: Quantitative responses were compared using T-test & Fisher-Exact tests. Inductive thematic analysis was applied to open-ended questions.
Results: Both U.S. and Chinese samples had relatively high intention to follow preventive behaviors overall. Differences in intended compliance with a specific recommendation appear to be driven by the different cultural norms in U.S. and China. Both groups expressed trepidation about the speed of COVID-19 vaccine development, driven by concern for safety among Chinese respondents, and concern for efficacy among U.S.
Respondents: The Chinese cohort expressed worries about other countries' passive handling of the pandemic while the U.S. cohort focused on domestic responses from individuals and government. U.S. participants appeared more knowledgeable on some aspects of COVID-19. Different perspectives regarding COVID-19 origins were identified among the two groups. Participants from both samples reported high trust in health professionals and international health organizations.
Conclusions: Mixed methods data from this cross-national analysis suggests sociocultural differences likely influence perceptions and knowledge of COVID-19 and its related public health policies. Discovering and addressing these culturally-based differences and perceptions are essential to coordinate a global pandemic response.
Keywords: COVID-19; Mixed methods; Public messaging; Sociocultural differences; U.S. and China.