• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Germs . Bibliometric analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza research globally from 2003 to 2023

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Germs


. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11-25.
doi: 10.18683/germs.2025.1451. eCollection 2025 Mar. Bibliometric analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza research globally from 2003 to 2023

Clement Meseko[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Uwem Okon Edet[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Okoroiwu Henshaw[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nicodemus Mkpuma[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Kayode Abraham Olawuyi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Charles Archibong[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: Despite decades of research on highly pathogenic avian influenza, especially H5N1, an understanding of the impact of research outputs on policy, the impact of funding and policies, collaboration between authors, and other bibliometric measurable indices is elusive.
Methods: H5N1 research data were retrieved from the PubMed database using "H5N1", "highly pathogenic", and "influenza" as keywords, and combined with the Boolean operator, "OR". The evaluated growth pattern of H5N1 research was analysed using Microsoft Excel, while the VOS viewer window version 1.6.15 was utilized in analyzing the keywords, authors' inputs, and collaborations amongst research institutes/universities involved in H5N1 research.
Results: A total of 8,411 articles published within 2003 and 2023 were retrieved. The trend of the published articles indicates that 2003 to 2004 had the lowest number of articles, while the highest were observed for 2009 and 2010. Since then, there has been a gradual decline. The most dominant article type was original research article (89.80%), followed by reviews with 7.54%. The most productive countries were Japan, the United States of America, China, and Egypt in Africa. The top 15 authors accounted for 12.40% of the total published data. Keywords analysis revealed the emergence of newer keywords such as H5N8, wild birds, mammals, and Nigeria; however, as expected, influenza virus avian H5N1 subtype was the dominant keyword. Research institutes with backgrounds in agriculture and veterinary medicine dominated the top 15 organizations involved in H5N1 research.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that research aimed at developing therapeutics and vaccines, as well as continuous surveillance in high-risk areas is urgently needed. Furthermore, the findings provide baseline data for all the stakeholders involved in H5N1 research, which could inform future research, funding, and policies.

Keywords: H5N1; evolution; highly pathogenic avian influenza; policies; research output.

 
Back
Top Bottom