• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Future Virol . Performance of six SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection systems in symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric and maternal patients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Future Virol


. 2021 Nov;10.2217/fvl-2021-0311.
doi: 10.2217/fvl-2021-0311. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
Performance of six SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection systems in symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric and maternal patients


Cameron A Brown[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Megan H Amerson-Brown[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Aliza Rahman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Charity R Webb[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ila R Singh[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], James J Dunn[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluated the real-world performance of six test systems for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 138 pediatric and 110 adult maternal patients. Materials & methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested directly using the Aptima™ SARS-CoV-2 (Aptima) and Simplexa™ COVID-19 Direct (Simplexa), and with Altona RealStar[SUP]®[/SUP] RT-PCR and CDC RT-PCR with nucleic acid extracted on the Roche[SUP]®[/SUP] MagNA Pure 96 (Altona-MP96) or bioMérieux EMAG[SUP]®[/SUP] (Altona-EMAG). Results/Conclusion: Overall percent-positive and percent-negative agreements among the six test systems were, respectively: Aptima: 94.8 and 100%; Altona-MP96: 96.5 and 99.3%; CDC-MP96: 100 and 99.3%; Altona-EMAG: 86.1 and 100%; CDC-EMAG: 98.2 and 100%; Simplexa: 87 and 99.2%. The six test systems showed agreement ranging from 92.7 (κ = 0.85) to 98.8% (κ = 0.98).

Keywords: RNA extraction; RT-PCR; SARS coronavirus; respiratory infection; surveillance.
 
Back
Top Bottom