• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Vet Sci . Risk factors associated with an outbreak of equine coronavirus at a large farm in North Carolina

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Vet Sci


. 2023 Mar 3;10:1060759.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1060759. eCollection 2023.
Risk factors associated with an outbreak of equine coronavirus at a large farm in North Carolina


Kate L Hepworth-Warren[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sara J Erwin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Caroline B Moore[SUP] 2 [/SUP], James R Talbot[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kimberly A S Young[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael J Neault[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jennifer C Haugland[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], James B Robertson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anthony T Blikslager[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Equine coronavirus (ECoV) leads to outbreaks with variable morbidity and mortality. Few previous reports of risk factors for infection are available in the literature.
Objectives: To describe unique clinical findings and risk factors for infection and development of clinical disease.
Animals: 135 horses on a farm affected by ECoV outbreak.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Data obtained included age, breed, gender, activity level, housing, and feed at the onset of the outbreak. Factors were evaluated for assessment of risk of infection using simple logistic regression or Fisher's exact test. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.
Results and findings: Forty-three of 54 (79.6%) horses tested on the farm were positive on fecal PCR for ECoV, and 17 horses (12.6%) developed clinical signs consistent with ECoV. Out of 17 horses in which the presence or absence of signs of colic was noted, 6 of 17 (35.3%) showed signs of colic. Three of these horses had small colon impactions, 2 of which required surgical intervention. Significant risk factors for having positive PCR results included being primarily stalled (OR 167.1, 95% CI 26.4-1719), housing next to a positive horse (OR 7.5, 95% CI 3.1-19.0), being in work (OR 26.9, 95% CI 4.6-281.9), being fed rationed hay vs. ad libitum (OR 1,558, 95% CI 130.8-15,593), and being fed alfalfa hay (OR 1,558, 95% CI 130.8-15,593).
Conclusions and clinical importance: This report describes risk factors for ECoV infection many of which were associated with intensive management of show horses. Clinicians should be aware that clinical signs vary and can include severe colic.

Keywords: ECoV; colic; coronavirus; diarrhea; small colon impaction.
 
Back
Top Bottom