• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Public Health . Pooling for SARS-CoV2 Surveillance: Validation and Strategy for Implementation in K-12 Schools

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health


. 2021 Dec 17;9:789402.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.789402. eCollection 2021.
Pooling for SARS-CoV2 Surveillance: Validation and Strategy for Implementation in K-12 Schools


Alexandra M Simas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jimmy W Crott[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Chris Sedore[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Augusta Rohrbach[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anthony P Monaco[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Stacey B Gabriel[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Niall Lennon[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Brendan Blumenstiel[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Caroline A Genco[SUP] 1 2 7 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Repeated testing of a population is critical for limiting the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and for the safe reopening of educational institutions such as kindergarten-grade 12 (K-12) schools and colleges. Many screening efforts utilize the CDC RT-PCR based assay which targets two regions of the novel Coronavirus nucleocapsid gene. The standard approach of testing each person individually, however, poses a financial burden to these institutions and is therefore a barrier to using testing for re-opening. Pooling samples from multiple individuals into a single test is an attractive alternate approach that promises significant cost savings-however the specificity and sensitivity of such approaches needs to be assessed prior to deployment. To this end, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of analyzing samples in pools of eight by the established RT-PCR assay. Participants (1,576) were recruited from amongst the Tufts University community undergoing regular screening. Each volunteer provided two swabs, one analyzed separately and the other in a pool of eight. Because the positivity rate was very low, we spiked approximately half of the pools with laboratory-generated swabs produced from known positive cases outside the Tufts testing program. The results of pooled tests had 100% correspondence with those of their respective individual tests. We conclude that pooling eight samples does not negatively impact the specificity or sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay and suggest that this approach can be utilized by institutions seeking to reduce surveillance costs.

Keywords: COVID-19; RT-PCR assay; SARS-CoV-2; pooled testing methodology; screening.
 
Back
Top Bottom