tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health
. 2026 Oct 8:14:1947309.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1947309. eCollection 2026.
Song Li 1 , Zhipeng Wang 1
Affiliations Expand
Introduction: During the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa, from March to May 2020, significant variations emerged among countries regarding the implementation of containment policies. During this period, viewed strictly from a public health perspective, social distancing and lockdowns were considered critical for curbing transmission. However, epidemic control outcomes varied considerably across countries. This variation raises questions about the independent and interactive influence of socioeconomic conditions on these outcomes, and about how political factors, including state capacity and party politics, moderate or mediate these influences, especially in resource-constrained contexts.
Methods: This article employs fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) with 52 African countries as case studies to investigate the combination of conditions for COVID-19 containment success.
Results: The analysis reveals three equifinal configurations: a party-led high-risk response pathway, an administrative compensation pathway, and a coercive compensation pathway. Party capacity is not a generally applicable determinant; its role is contingent upon the specific governance context. Under the structural constraint of healthcare deficiency, distinct dimensions of state capacity operate through differentiated compensatory mechanisms.
Discussion: The paper makes two theoretical contributions: conceptualizing party capacity as a crisis-contingent rather than a generalized governance asset, and disaggregating state capacity into administrative and coercive dimensions with distinct compensatory functions. It also makes a methodological contribution by adopting a configurational approach that examines combinations of conditions rather than the net effects of individual factors.
Keywords: African politics; COVID-19; pandemic governance; qualitative comparative analysis; ruling party capacity; state capacity.
. 2026 Oct 8:14:1947309.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1947309. eCollection 2026.
Party capacity, state capacity, and pandemic governance: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of COVID-19 prevention and control outcomes in 52 African countries during the early stage
Song Li 1 , Zhipeng Wang 1
Affiliations Expand
- PMID: 42923182
- PMCID: PMC13687033
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1947309
Abstract
Introduction: During the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa, from March to May 2020, significant variations emerged among countries regarding the implementation of containment policies. During this period, viewed strictly from a public health perspective, social distancing and lockdowns were considered critical for curbing transmission. However, epidemic control outcomes varied considerably across countries. This variation raises questions about the independent and interactive influence of socioeconomic conditions on these outcomes, and about how political factors, including state capacity and party politics, moderate or mediate these influences, especially in resource-constrained contexts.
Methods: This article employs fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) with 52 African countries as case studies to investigate the combination of conditions for COVID-19 containment success.
Results: The analysis reveals three equifinal configurations: a party-led high-risk response pathway, an administrative compensation pathway, and a coercive compensation pathway. Party capacity is not a generally applicable determinant; its role is contingent upon the specific governance context. Under the structural constraint of healthcare deficiency, distinct dimensions of state capacity operate through differentiated compensatory mechanisms.
Discussion: The paper makes two theoretical contributions: conceptualizing party capacity as a crisis-contingent rather than a generalized governance asset, and disaggregating state capacity into administrative and coercive dimensions with distinct compensatory functions. It also makes a methodological contribution by adopting a configurational approach that examines combinations of conditions rather than the net effects of individual factors.
Keywords: African politics; COVID-19; pandemic governance; qualitative comparative analysis; ruling party capacity; state capacity.