• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Public Health . Optimizing influenza prevention: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of pediatric vaccination programs and vaccine t

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health


. 2025 Oct 30:13:1589403.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589403. eCollection 2025. Optimizing influenza prevention: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of pediatric vaccination programs and vaccine types

Nilay Aksoy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nur Ozturk[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tamas Agh[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Przemyslaw Kardas[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Bayram Şahin[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: Seasonal influenza is a major cause of illness and death worldwide. Vaccination remains the cornerstone of prevention, with options including trivalent inactivated (TIV), quadrivalent inactivated (QIV), and live-attenuated vaccines. This study aimed to provide a systematic overview of the cost-effectiveness of pediatric influenza vaccination programs, with a particular focus on comparing different vaccine types.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for records published between 2013 and 2024. The target population included individuals younger than 18 years. The primary research question was: Which influenza vaccines, trivalent, quadrivalent, or live-attenuated, are more cost-effective, and how does introducing seasonal vaccination for children under 18 influence healthcare costs and health outcomes? Data extraction was performed using a structured Excel spreadsheet.
Results: This review included 33 studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most studies support the conclusion that vaccinating children is an effective and cost-effective strategy for reducing influenza transmission. Cost-effectiveness varied depending on epidemiological and demographic factors, the type of vaccine used, and age group differences, which were influenced by the analytical perspective and local health and economic conditions.
Conclusion: This review confirms that pediatric influenza vaccination is a cost-effective intervention, particularly with quadrivalent vaccines. The optimal choice of vaccine and strategy should be tailored to local population needs and economic conditions to maximize public health benefits.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; live-attenuated vaccine; pediatric influenza vaccination; pharmacoeconomics; quadrivalent vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom