• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Public Health . Constructing a screening model to identify patients at high risk of hospital-acquired influenza on admission to hospital

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health


. 2025 Apr 16:13:1495794.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1495794. eCollection 2025. Constructing a screening model to identify patients at high risk of hospital-acquired influenza on admission to hospital

Shangshu Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Peng Li[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Bo Qiao[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hongying Qin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Zhenzhen Wu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Leilei Guo[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: To develop a machine learning (ML)-based admission screening model for hospital-acquired (HA) influenza using routinely available data to support early clinical intervention.
Methods: The study focused on hospitalized patients from January 2021 to May 2024. The case group consisted of patients with HA influenza, while the control group comprised non-HA influenza patients admitted to the same ward in the HA influenza unit within 2 weeks. The 953 subjects were divided into the training set and the validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Feature screening was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and the Boruta algorithm. Subsequently eight ML algorithms were applied to analyze and identify the optimal model using a 5-fold cross-validation methodology. And the area under the curve (AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (AP), F1 score, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to comprehensively assess the predictive effectiveness of the selected models. Feature factors were selected and feature importance's were assessed using SHapley's additive interpretation (SHAP). Furthermore, an interactive web-based platform was additionally developed to visualize and demonstrate the predictive model.
Results: Age, pneumonia on admission, Chronic renal failure, Malignant tumor, hypoproteinemia, glucocorticoid use, admission to ICU, lymphopenia, BMI were identified as key variables. For the eight ML algorithms, ROC values ranging from 0.548 to 0.812 were observed in the validation set. A comprehensive analysis showed that the XGBoost model predicted the highest accuracy (AUC: 0.812) with an F1 score of 0.590 and the highest A p value (0.655). Evaluating the optimal model, the AUC values were 0.995, 0.826, and 0.781 for the training, validation and test sets. The XGBoost model showed strong robust. SHapley's additive interpretation (SHAP) was utilized to analyze the contribution of explanatory variables to the model and their correlation with HA influenza. In addition, we developed a practical online prediction tool to calculate the risk of HA influenza occurrence.
Conclusion: Based on the routine data, the XGBoost model demonstrated excellent calibration among all ML algorithms and accurately predicted the risk of HA influenza, thereby serving as an effective tool for early screening of HA influenza.

Keywords: SHAP (SHapley’s additive explanation); hospital-acquired influenza; machine learning; practical tool; prediction model.

 
Back
Top