• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Public Health . Assessment of Saliva Specimens' Reliability for COVID-19 Surveillance

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health


. 2022 Apr 4;10:840996.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.840996. eCollection 2022.
Assessment of Saliva Specimens' Reliability for COVID-19 Surveillance


Biancamaria Pierri[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maria Tafuro[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maria Concetta Cuomo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Denise Di Concilio[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lucia Vassallo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrea Pierri[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amedeo Ferro[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Giuseppe Rofrano[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alfonso Gallo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Antonio Di Stasio[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrea Mancusi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lydia Galdi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Annachiara Coppola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carlo Buonerba[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Luigi Atripaldi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pellegrino Cerino[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to assess saliva as a reliable specimen for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), especially in community mass screening programs. The performance analysis considered 1,221 total samples [nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and corresponding saliva], tested by means of a reference diagnostic real-time RT-PCR assay. Conflicting results were further investigated with a second, more sensitive, reference assay. Analysis of agreement showed a good concordance (95.82%), with a k coefficient value of.74 (p < 0.001); moreover, a follow-up analysis revealed the presence of viral gene targets in saliva samples at the time point the corresponding NP swabs turned negative. Data obtained prove the reliability of this alternative biofluid for SARS-CoV-2 detection in real-time RT-PCR. Considering the role of saliva in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission and pathogenesis, and the advantages in the use of salivary diagnostics, the present validation supports the use of saliva as an optimal choice in large-scale population screening and monitoring of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Keywords: COVID-19 screening; SARS-CoV-2; nasopharyngeal swab; real-time RT-PCR; saliva.
 
Back
Top Bottom